[dpdk-dev] Cleanup of secondary proc fbarray files?
Eads, Gage
gage.eads at intel.com
Tue Jul 31 18:36:36 CEST 2018
As far as I can tell, DPDK does not destroy secondary process fbarray files - i.e. those whose names end with "_<PID>". With enough secondary processes and memory usage per application, and after enough repeat executions, these can take up a significant amount of space. Is the user expected to clean these up themselves, or is this a bug in DPDK?
Perhaps this is a good candidate for including in rte_eal_cleanup()?
Thanks,
Gage
More information about the dev
mailing list