[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/testpmd: print Rx/Tx offload values

Ferruh Yigit ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Mon Mar 12 18:46:14 CET 2018


On 3/12/2018 5:26 PM, Yongseok Koh wrote:
> 
>> On Mar 12, 2018, at 8:05 AM, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Which per port offloads are enabled is not clear. Printing offloads
>> values at forwarding start.
>>
>> CRC strip offload value was printed in more verbose manner, it is
>> removed since Rx/Tx offload values covers it and printing only CRC one
>> can cause confusion.
>>
>> Hexadecimal offloads values are not very user friendly but preferred to
>> not create to much noise during forwarding start.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
>> ---
>> Cc: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs at mellanox.com>
>> Cc: Yongseok Koh <yskoh at mellanox.com>
>>
>> v2:
>> * Add Rxq and Txq stats too
>> * Split Rx an Tx related logs and place them related group
>> ---
>> app/test-pmd/config.c | 13 +++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c
>> index 4bb255c62..6249b19bb 100644
>> --- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
>> +++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
>> @@ -1682,10 +1682,6 @@ rxtx_config_display(void)
>> 		struct rte_eth_txconf *tx_conf = &ports[pid].tx_conf;
>>
>> 		printf("  port %d:\n", (unsigned int)pid);
>> -		printf("  CRC stripping %s\n",
>> -				(ports[pid].dev_conf.rxmode.offloads &
>> -				 DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP) ?
>> -				"enabled" : "disabled");
>> 		printf("  RX queues=%d - RX desc=%d - RX free threshold=%d\n",
>> 				nb_rxq, nb_rxd, rx_conf->rx_free_thresh);
>> 		printf("  RX threshold registers: pthresh=%d hthresh=%d "
>> @@ -1693,6 +1689,9 @@ rxtx_config_display(void)
>> 				rx_conf->rx_thresh.pthresh,
>> 				rx_conf->rx_thresh.hthresh,
>> 				rx_conf->rx_thresh.wthresh);
>> +		printf("  Rx offloads=0x%"PRIx64" RXQ Offloads=0x%"PRIx64"\n",
>> +				ports[pid].dev_conf.rxmode.offloads,
>> +				rx_conf->offloads);
>> 		printf("  TX queues=%d - TX desc=%d - TX free threshold=%d\n",
>> 				nb_txq, nb_txd, tx_conf->tx_free_thresh);
>> 		printf("  TX threshold registers: pthresh=%d hthresh=%d "
>> @@ -1700,8 +1699,10 @@ rxtx_config_display(void)
>> 				tx_conf->tx_thresh.pthresh,
>> 				tx_conf->tx_thresh.hthresh,
>> 				tx_conf->tx_thresh.wthresh);
>> -		printf("  TX RS bit threshold=%d - TXQ offloads=0x%"PRIx64"\n",
>> -				tx_conf->tx_rs_thresh, tx_conf->offloads);
>> +		printf("  TX RS bit threshold=%d\n", tx_conf->tx_rs_thresh);
>> +		printf("  Tx Offloads=0x%"PRIx64" TXQ offloads=0x%"PRIx64"\n",
> 
> Small comment. It would be better to be consistent between "Offloads" and "offloads"
> for Rx and Tx. :-)

Right :) I will send a new version.

> 
> Other than that,
> 
> Acked-by: Yongseok Koh <yskoh at mellanox.com>
> Thanks
> 



More information about the dev mailing list