[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40evf: add multicast MAC address filtering

[Ferruh Yigit]

On 3/28/2018 11:15 AM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
> Hi Ferruh:
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Yigit, Ferruh
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 6:01 PM
>> To: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>; Olivier Matz
>> <olivier.matz at 6wind.com>; dev at dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei
>> <beilei.xing at intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40evf: add multicast MAC address
>> filtering
>>
>> On 3/27/2018 2:51 PM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Matz
>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 10:36 PM
>>>> To: dev at dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing at intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
>>>> <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>
>>>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40evf: add multicast MAC address
>>>> filtering
>>>>
>>>> Add support the set_mc_addr_list device operation in the i40evf PMD.
>>>>
>>>> The configured addresses are stored in the device private area, so
>>>> they can be flushed before adding new ones.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz at 6wind.com>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>
>>>
>>> Thanks for enable this!
>>
>> Hi Qi,
>>
>> This feature was already documented as supported in i40e_vf.ini which
>> seems wrong but now it is supported.
>>
>> i40e also documents this feature as supported, can you please check if the
>> feature is supported there and update i40e.ini if required?
> 
> Do you mean
> 
> " Multicast MAC filter = Y" ?
> 
> My understanding is, though i40e PF/VF doesn't support set_mc_addr_list, but we still can use mac_addr_add to add a multi cast address, so we still have that flag on in i40e.ini.

Right, current "mac_addr_add" dev_ops lets setting multicast addresses. In this
logic if HW supports setting multicast address PMD may claim this support.

Or this may explicitly mean implementing set_mc_addr_list dev_ops in driver.


These feature list is to help user / application developer about what to expect
and what to not from drivers.

A user may expect set_mc_addr_list dev_ops is implemented when this feature
documented and it may be confusing when it fails.

Overall which information, hw supports setting mc mad address or
set_mc_addr_list implemented, adds more value from user point of view? What do
you think?

> 
> Regards
> Qi
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> ferruh