[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix generic tunnel offloading compatibility check
Yongseok Koh
yskoh at mellanox.com
Thu May 24 00:45:25 CEST 2018
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 02:59:37PM +0300, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
> On some distros, the inbox rdma-core tree can contain the Software
> Parser enum while the remaining structs still missing.
>
> Fixes: 5f8ba81c4228 ("net/mlx5: support generic tunnel offloading")
> Cc: xuemingl at mellanox.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs at mellanox.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/mlx5/Makefile | 7 ++++++-
> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/Makefile b/drivers/net/mlx5/Makefile
> index 293144e8a0..b09dd785ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/Makefile
> @@ -118,11 +118,16 @@ mlx5_autoconf.h.new: $(RTE_SDK)/buildtools/auto-config-h.sh
> enum IBV_WQ_FLAG_RX_END_PADDING \
> $(AUTOCONF_OUTPUT)
> $Q sh -- '$<' '$@' \
> - HAVE_IBV_MLX5_MOD_SWP \
> + HAVE_IBV_MLX5_MOD_SWP_MASK \
> infiniband/mlx5dv.h \
> enum MLX5DV_CONTEXT_MASK_SWP \
> $(AUTOCONF_OUTPUT)
> $Q sh -- '$<' '$@' \
> + HAVE_IBV_MLX5_MOD_SWP_CAPS \
> + infiniband/mlx5dv.h \
> + type 'struct mlx5dv_sw_parsing_caps' \
> + $(AUTOCONF_OUTPUT)
> + $Q sh -- '$<' '$@' \
> HAVE_IBV_MLX5_MOD_MPW \
> infiniband/mlx5dv.h \
> enum MLX5DV_CONTEXT_FLAGS_MPW_ALLOWED \
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c
> index 006665600a..91dafe93ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c
> @@ -775,7 +775,7 @@ mlx5_pci_probe(struct rte_pci_driver *pci_drv __rte_unused,
> }
> ibv_dev = list[i];
> DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "device opened");
> -#ifdef HAVE_IBV_MLX5_MOD_SWP
> +#ifdef HAVE_IBV_MLX5_MOD_SWP_MASK
> attrs_out.comp_mask |= MLX5DV_CONTEXT_MASK_SWP;
> #endif
> /*
> @@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ mlx5_pci_probe(struct rte_pci_driver *pci_drv __rte_unused,
> DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "MPW isn't supported");
> mps = MLX5_MPW_DISABLED;
> }
> -#ifdef HAVE_IBV_MLX5_MOD_SWP
> +#if defined(HAVE_IBV_MLX5_MOD_SWP_MASK) && defined(HAVE_IBV_MLX5_MOD_SWP_CAPS)
> if (attrs_out.comp_mask & MLX5DV_CONTEXT_MASK_SWP)
> swp = attrs_out.sw_parsing_caps.sw_parsing_offloads;
> DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "SWP support: %u", swp);
You mean, even if the mask is defined, the capability struct might not be
defined, right? If the capability struct is defined, is the mask always defined?
I guess so. Then, how about just checking the struct instead of enum in order to
define HAVE_IBV_MLX5_MOD_SWP, instead of splitting it into two macros?
Thanks,
Yongseok
More information about the dev
mailing list