[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/17] vhost: fix messages error checks
Ilya Maximets
i.maximets at samsung.com
Tue Oct 2 16:15:31 CEST 2018
On 02.10.2018 12:36, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Return of message handling has now changed to an enum that can
> take non-negative value that is not zero in case a reply is
> needed. But the code checking the variable afterwards has not
> been updated, leading to success messages handling being
> treated as errors.
>
> Fixes: 4e601952cae6 ("vhost: message handling implemented as a callback array")
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
> index 7ef3fb4a4..060b41893 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
> @@ -1783,7 +1783,7 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd)
> }
>
> skip_to_post_handle:
> - if (!ret && dev->extern_ops.post_msg_handle) {
> + if (ret != VH_RESULT_ERR && dev->extern_ops.post_msg_handle) {
> uint32_t need_reply;
>
> ret = (*dev->extern_ops.post_msg_handle)(
> @@ -1800,10 +1800,10 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd)
> vhost_user_unlock_all_queue_pairs(dev);
>
> if (msg.flags & VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY) {
Maybe we need to reply here only if we didn't reply
already (not VH_RESULT_REPLY) ? Otherwise, we could
reply twice (with payload and with return code).
> - msg.payload.u64 = !!ret;
> + msg.payload.u64 = ret == VH_RESULT_ERR;
> msg.size = sizeof(msg.payload.u64);
> send_vhost_reply(fd, &msg);
> - } else if (ret) {
> + } else if (ret == VH_RESULT_ERR) {
> RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG,
> "vhost message handling failed.\n");
> return -1;
>
More information about the dev
mailing list