[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] app/testpmd: move dumping packets to a separate function
Ferruh Yigit
ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Thu Oct 11 16:56:18 CEST 2018
On 10/7/2018 8:38 AM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
> verbosity for the received/sent packets is needed in all of the
> forwarding engines so moving it to be in a separate function
+1, this is good idea.
> ---
> changes in v3:
> - add util.c in the mason.build file
> - restore missing check for ol_flags & PKT_RX_RSS_HASH.
> - add local variables for rte_be_to_cpu to avoid long
> lines.
>
> changes in v4:
> - add missing l3 and l4 checks
> ---
>
> Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland at mellanox.com>
<...>
> @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifie.r: BSD-3-Clause
> + * Copyri.ght(c) 2010-2018 Mellanox technology.
It can be good to keep original Copyright owner when moving some code from one
file another.
<...>
> + sw_packet_type = rte_net_get_ptype(mb, &hdr_lens,
> + RTE_PTYPE_ALL_MASK);
DPDK coding convention requires a single tab in next line, instead of alligning
to the parenthesis.
<...>
> + /* Do not support ipv4 option field */
> + if (RTE_ETH_IS_IPV4_HDR(packet_type)) {
> + l3_len = sizeof(struct ipv4_hdr);
> + ipv4_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(mb,
> + struct ipv4_hdr *,
> + l2_len);
> + l4_proto = ipv4_hdr->next_proto_id;
The syntax broken here.
<...>
> + }
> + printf(" - %s queue=0x%x", is_rx ? "Receive" : "Send",
> + (unsigned int) queue);
Isn't this same information with initial header line, does this add any
extra/new information?
More information about the dev
mailing list