[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/9] app/procinfo: add code for debug crypto
Pattan, Reshma
reshma.pattan at intel.com
Fri Oct 26 15:01:58 CEST 2018
Hi
-----Original Message-----
From: Varghese, Vipin
---
+ struct rte_cryptodev_info dev_info = {0};
+ struct rte_cryptodev_stats stats = {0};
+
Memset for initialization as mentioned in other patch.
+
+#define DSP_CRYPTO_FLAG(x) do { \
+printf(" - feature flags\n"); \
+printf("\t -- symmetric (%c) asymmetric (%c)" \ " symmetric operation
+chaining (%c)\n", \ (x & RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_SYMMETRIC_CRYPTO)?'y':'n', \
+(x & RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_ASYMMETRIC_CRYPTO)?'y':'n', \ (x &
+RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_SYM_OPERATION_CHAINING)?'y':'n'); \ printf("\t -- CPU
+SSE (%c) AVX (%c) AVX2 (%c) AVX512 (%c)\n", \ (x &
+RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_CPU_SSE)?'y':'n', \ (x &
+RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_CPU_AVX)?'y':'n', \ (x &
+RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_CPU_AVX2)?'y':'n', \ (x &
+RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_CPU_AVX512)?'y':'n'); \ printf("\t -- Acclerate CPU
+AESNI (%c) HW (%c)\n", \ (x & RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_CPU_AESNI)?'y':'n', \ (x
+& RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_HW_ACCELERATED)?'y':'n'); \ printf("\t -- INLINE
+(%c)\n", \ (x & RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_SECURITY)?'y':'n'); \ printf("\t --
+ARM NEON (%c) CE (%c)\n", \ (x & RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_CPU_NEON)?'y':'n', \
+(x & RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_CPU_ARM_CE)?'y':'n'); \ printf(" - buffer
+offload\n"); \ printf("\t -- IN_PLACE_SGL (%c)\n", \ (x &
+RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_IN_PLACE_SGL)?'y':'n'); \ printf("\t --
+OOP_SGL_IN_SGL_OUT (%c)\n", \ (x &
+RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_OOP_SGL_IN_SGL_OUT)?'y':'n'); \ printf("\t --
+OOP_SGL_IN_LB_OUT (%c)\n", \ (x &
+RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_OOP_SGL_IN_LB_OUT)?'y':'n'); \ printf("\t --
+OOP_LB_IN_SGL_OUT (%c)\n", \ (x &
+RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_OOP_LB_IN_SGL_OUT)?'y':'n'); \ printf("\t --
+OOP_LB_IN_LB_OUT (%c)\n", \ (x &
+RTE_CRYPTODEV_FF_OOP_LB_IN_LB_OUT)?'y':'n'); \ } while (0)
This is a very big macro, better have static function for this instead of macro.
Thanks,
Reshma
More information about the dev
mailing list