[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] ethdev: fix null pointer checking

[David Marchand]

On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 6:53 PM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com> wrote:

> On 4/3/2019 5:41 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 05:35:22PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> >> On 4/3/2019 5:27 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>> 03/04/2019 18:07, Mohammad Abdul Awal:
> >>>> Null value for parameter name will cause segfault for the strnlen and
> >>>> strcmp functions.
> >>>
> >>> I'm not sure we want such obvious checks for all APIs.  Here I would
> >>> say yes.
> >>
> >> These are internal functions, not APIs.  I am for verifying input for
> >> (all) APIs but not for internal functions, drivers should call them and
> >> they are in our control, if they are passing NULL we can fix them :)
> >>
> > True, but if these are control path or init time code paths rather than
> > data path APIs, I don't see the harm in putting in the checks.
>
> No harm from performance point of view, agree, but also looks unnecessary
> to me.
>

+1
All the more when you see the following patches that adds input checks in
the faulty/too naive drivers.


-- 
David Marchand