[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test/ipsec: fix logic around dequeue burst
Ananyev, Konstantin
konstantin.ananyev at intel.com
Fri Apr 12 12:31:15 CEST 2019
Hi Bernard,
/ipsec: fix logic around dequeue burst
>
> Call rte_crypto_dequeue_burst() in a loop with
> a delay to ensure that all the packets are dequeued
> from the crtpto device.
>
> Fixes: 59d7353b0df0 ("test/ipsec: fix test suite setup")
> Cc: stable at dpdk.org
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger at intel.com>
> ---
> app/test/test_ipsec.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_ipsec.c b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
> index 80a2d25..25a7df4 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_ipsec.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_ipsec.c
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
> #include <rte_mbuf.h>
> #include <rte_malloc.h>
> #include <rte_memcpy.h>
> -#include <rte_pause.h>
> +#include <rte_cycles.h>
> #include <rte_bus_vdev.h>
> #include <rte_ip.h>
>
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
> #define OUTBOUND_SPI 17
> #define BURST_SIZE 32
> #define REORDER_PKTS 1
> +#define DEQUEUE_COUNT 1000
>
> struct user_params {
> enum rte_crypto_sym_xform_type auth;
> @@ -758,7 +759,9 @@ crypto_ipsec(uint16_t num_pkts)
> struct ipsec_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
> struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
> uint32_t k, ng;
> + uint32_t pkt_cnt;
> struct rte_ipsec_group grp[1];
> + int i;
>
> /* call crypto prepare */
> k = rte_ipsec_pkt_crypto_prepare(&ut_params->ss[0], ut_params->ibuf,
> @@ -774,9 +777,15 @@ crypto_ipsec(uint16_t num_pkts)
> return TEST_FAILED;
> }
>
> - k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
> - ut_params->cop, num_pkts);
> - if (k != num_pkts) {
> + for (i = 0, pkt_cnt = 0;
> + i < DEQUEUE_COUNT && pkt_cnt != num_pkts; i++) {
> + k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
> + &ut_params->cop[pkt_cnt], num_pkts - pkt_cnt);
> + pkt_cnt += k;
> + rte_delay_us(1);
> + }
Looks good to me.
My only suggestion would be to put that loop in a separate function
to avoid duplications.
Apart from that:
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>
> +
> + if (pkt_cnt != num_pkts) {
> RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst fail\n");
> return TEST_FAILED;
> }
> @@ -868,7 +877,7 @@ crypto_ipsec_2sa(void)
> struct ipsec_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
> struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
> struct rte_ipsec_group grp[BURST_SIZE];
> -
> + uint32_t pkt_cnt;
> uint32_t k, ng, i, r;
>
> for (i = 0; i < BURST_SIZE; i++) {
> @@ -890,9 +899,14 @@ crypto_ipsec_2sa(void)
> }
> }
>
> - k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
> - ut_params->cop, BURST_SIZE);
> - if (k != BURST_SIZE) {
> + for (i = 0, k = 0, pkt_cnt = 0;
> + i < DEQUEUE_COUNT && pkt_cnt != BURST_SIZE; i++) {
> + k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
> + &ut_params->cop[pkt_cnt], BURST_SIZE - pkt_cnt);
> + pkt_cnt += k;
> + rte_delay_us(1);
> + }
> + if (pkt_cnt != BURST_SIZE) {
> RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst fail\n");
> return TEST_FAILED;
> }
> @@ -1007,6 +1021,7 @@ crypto_ipsec_2sa_4grp(void)
> struct ipsec_unitest_params *ut_params = &unittest_params;
> struct rte_ipsec_group grp[BURST_SIZE];
> uint32_t k, ng, i, j;
> + uint32_t pkt_cnt;
> uint32_t rc = 0;
>
> for (i = 0; i < BURST_SIZE; i++) {
> @@ -1029,9 +1044,14 @@ crypto_ipsec_2sa_4grp(void)
> }
> }
>
> - k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
> - ut_params->cop, BURST_SIZE);
> - if (k != BURST_SIZE) {
> + for (i = 0, k = 0, pkt_cnt = 0;
> + i < DEQUEUE_COUNT && pkt_cnt != BURST_SIZE; i++) {
> + k = rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(ts_params->valid_dev, 0,
> + &ut_params->cop[pkt_cnt], BURST_SIZE - pkt_cnt);
> + pkt_cnt += k;
> + rte_delay_us(1);
> + }
> + if (pkt_cnt != BURST_SIZE) {
> RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1, "rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst fail\n");
> return TEST_FAILED;
> }
> --
> 2.7.4
More information about the dev
mailing list