[dpdk-dev] [RFC v2] net: fix rte_vlan_insert with shared mbuf

Ferruh Yigit ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Fri Apr 12 18:35:49 CEST 2019


On 3/28/2019 8:53 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> If mbuf is shared then rte_vlan_insert() would clobber the original
> Ethernet header. The changed version handles this by getting
> an mbuf that will hold the new Ethernet and VLAN header followed
> by another mbuf (cloned) for the data.

Hi Stephen, Chas,

Since this patch is still an RFC, and we are after RC1, I think it is better to
consider this patch for next release.

But for this release, what do you think having a patch to return error on
'rte_vlan_insert()' for shared mbufs?


> 
> Fixes: c974021a5949 ("ether: add soft vlan encap/decap")
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin at microsoft.com>
> ---
> v2 - compile tested only, do copy/clone.
> 
>  lib/librte_net/rte_ether.h | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_net/rte_ether.h b/lib/librte_net/rte_ether.h
> index c2c5e249ffe9..5fc306e5d08c 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_net/rte_ether.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_net/rte_ether.h
> @@ -374,10 +374,10 @@ static inline int rte_vlan_strip(struct rte_mbuf *m)
>   * Software version of VLAN unstripping
>   *
>   * @param m
> - *   The packet mbuf.
> + *   Pointer to the packet mbuf.
>   * @return
>   *   - 0: On success
> - *   -EPERM: mbuf is is shared overwriting would be unsafe
> + *   -ENOMEM: could not allocate mbuf for header
>   *   -ENOSPC: not enough headroom in mbuf
>   */
>  static inline int rte_vlan_insert(struct rte_mbuf **m)
> @@ -385,15 +385,34 @@ static inline int rte_vlan_insert(struct rte_mbuf **m)
>  	struct ether_hdr *oh, *nh;
>  	struct vlan_hdr *vh;
>  
> -	/* Can't insert header if mbuf is shared */
> -	if (rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(*m) > 1) {
> -		struct rte_mbuf *copy;
> +	/* Can't safely directly insert header if mbuf is shared or indirect */
> +	if (!RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(*m) || rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(*m) > 1) {
> +		struct rte_mempool *mp = (*m)->pool;
> +		struct rte_mbuf *md, *mh;
> +
> +		mh = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(mp);
> +		if (unlikely(mh == NULL))
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +		mh->tx_offload = (*m)->tx_offload;
> +		mh->vlan_tci = (*m)->vlan_tci;
> +		mh->vlan_tci_outer = (*m)->vlan_tci_outer;
> +		mh->port = (*m)->port;
> +		mh->ol_flags = (*m)->ol_flags;
> +		mh->packet_type = (*m)->packet_type;
>  
> -		copy = rte_pktmbuf_clone(*m, (*m)->pool);
> -		if (unlikely(copy == NULL))
> +		md = rte_pktmbuf_clone(*m, mp);
> +		if (unlikely(md == NULL)) {
> +			rte_pktmbuf_free(mh);
>  			return -ENOMEM;
> -		rte_pktmbuf_free(*m);
> -		*m = copy;
> +		}
> +
> +		mh->next = md;
> +		mh->nb_segs = md->nb_segs + 1;
> +		memcpy(rte_pktmbuf_append(mh, ETHER_HDR_LEN),
> +		       rte_pktmbuf_mtod(md, void *), ETHER_HDR_LEN);
> +		rte_pktmbuf_adj(md, ETHER_HDR_LEN);
> +		*m = mh;
>  	}
>  
>  	oh = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(*m, struct ether_hdr *);
> 



More information about the dev mailing list