[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eventdev: promote adapter functions as stable

[Thomas Monjalon]

> > Promote the adapter functions and rte_event_port_unlinks_in_progress()
> > as stable as it's been added for a while now and multiple drivers and test
> > application like test-eventdev has been tested using the adapter APIs.
> > 
> > Cc: nikhil.rao at intel.com
> > Cc: erik.g.carrillo at intel.com
> > Cc: abhinandan.gujjar at intel.com
> > Cc: pbhagavatula at marvell.com
> > Cc: hemant.agrawal at nxp.com
> > Cc: nipun.gupta at nxp.com
> > Cc: harry.van.haaren at intel.com
> > Cc: mattias.ronnblom at ericsson.com
> > Cc: liang.j.ma at intel.com
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj at marvell.com>
> > ---
> >  /**
> > - * @warning
> > - * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice
> > - *
> >   * Register callback to process Rx packets, this is supported for
> >   * SW based packet transfers.
> >   * @see rte_event_eth_rx_cb_fn
> > @@ -501,7 +453,7 @@ int
> > rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_service_id_get(uint8_t id, uint32_t *service_id);
> >   *  - 0: Success
> >   *  - <0: Error code on failure.
> >   */
> > -int __rte_experimental
> > +int
> >  rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_cb_register(uint8_t id,
> >  				uint16_t eth_dev_id,
> >  				rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_cb_fn cb_fn, 
> 
> Sorry for the delay in reply, I would like to retain the rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_cb_register() function as experimental. 
> I will be posting a patch for this function to accept events instead of mbufs.
> 
> Since Thomas just applied the patch, should I be posting a new patch that reverts the lines above ?

Sorry I hesitated to wait more for your feedback.
Guessing the right time to apply a patch is a difficult heuristic :)
Yes please send a patch to revert for this function.