[dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 1/2] eal: replace libc-based random number generation with LFSR
Stephen Hemminger
stephen at networkplumber.org
Mon Apr 22 16:49:33 CEST 2019
On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 07:34:20 -0400
Neil Horman <nhorman at tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> > +
> > +uint64_t __rte_experimental
> > +rte_rand(void)
> Do you really want to mark this as experimental? I know it will trigger the
> symbol checker with a warning if you don't, but this function already existed
> previously and was accepted as part of the ABI. Given that the prototype hasn't
> changed, I think you just need to accept it as a non-experimental function
Agree with Neil. Don't mark existing functions as experimental.
More information about the dev
mailing list