[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Some fixes for vhost zero copy

Maxime Coquelin maxime.coquelin at redhat.com
Wed Feb 27 09:32:08 CET 2019



On 2/27/19 2:52 AM, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 03:46:41PM +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>> On 2/22/19 3:42 AM, Tiwei Bie wrote:
>>> Tiwei Bie (4):
>>>     vhost: restore mbuf first when freeing zmbuf
>>>     vhost: fix potential use-after-free for zero copy mbuf
>>>     vhost: fix potential use-after-free for memory region
>>>     doc: improve vhost zero copy guide
>>>
>>>    doc/guides/prog_guide/vhost_lib.rst |  3 +++
>>>    lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h            | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c       | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>    lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c       | 34 -----------------------
>>>    4 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Looking at the spec, I think we may need also to drain zmbufs in the
>> VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_ENABLE for the disable case:
>>
>> ""
>> If VHOST_USER_F_PROTOCOL_FEATURES has been negotiated, the ring is
>> initialized
>> in a disabled state. Client must not pass data to/from the backend until
>> ring is enabled by
>> VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_ENABLE with parameter 1, or after it has been disabled
>> by
>> VHOST_USER_SET_VRING_ENABLE with parameter 0.
>>
>> Each ring is initialized in a stopped state, client must not process it
>> until
>> ring is started, or *after it has been stopped*.
>> ""
>>
>> Do you take care of this or I send a patch on top?
> 
> Agree. Please feel free to send any patch on top.

Good, I'll do the patch now.

Maxime

> Thanks!
> Tiwei
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Maxime


More information about the dev mailing list