[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/7] bbdev: adding support in BBDEV for 5GNR FEC

Thomas Monjalon thomas at monjalon.net
Wed Jul 3 22:27:53 CEST 2019


03/07/2019 20:31, Chautru, Nicolas:
> Thomas wrote:
> >> Nicolas Chautru (7):
> >>   bbdev: renaming non-generic LTE specific structure
> >>   bbdev: extension of BBDEV API for 5G FEC
> >>   docs/guides: updating bbdev API for 5GNR operations
> >>   baseband/turbo_sw: extension of turbosw PMD for 5G
> >>   docs/guides: updating building steps for BBDEV PMD
> >>   test-bbdev: update of bbdev test-app for 5GNR
> >>   test-bbdev: test vectors for 5GNR verification
> >
> >What are the news about the turbo_sw PMD?
> >We are still not able to compile it.
> >After a very long time of asking for the dependency, what can be the incentive to get Intel delivering it?
> >Should we block any merge in bbdev until it happens?
> 
> Hi Thomas, 
> What you are referring to was resolved with that previous serie https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=5093&state=*
> The turbo_sw_pmd is built by default now and is verified by the DPDK CI. As an option this can be built against the real time signal processing libraries (FlexRAN FEC SDK). The link to latest version of this library is also provided https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/flexran-lte-and-5g-nr-fec-software-development-kit-modules>

Whaouh, it happens and I did not notice it!

> I believe that you reviewed this scheme previously earlier Ferruh of the Tech board as you did provide feedback on the related published article as well as recommended to split the previous serie into several patchsets. 

Indeed, and I did not follow the latest news.

> The last serie under review here in that email thread is the extension of the turbo_sw_pmd driver to support 5GNR operations but still rely on the exact same model and dependency, the only limitation is that these libraries requires AVX512 support for 5GNR operations. 
> 
> Let me know whether there is any discrepancy and want to discuss further through that mailing list, tech board or other method. In case you are trying to compile the SDK and have any issues let us know as well. 

That's fine, I can keep cool, thanks.




More information about the dev mailing list