[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 03/15] bus/pci: add fallback for out[lwb]_p for non GNU libc
Thomas Monjalon
thomas at monjalon.net
Thu Jul 4 15:20:55 CEST 2019
04/07/2019 14:16, Natanael Copa:
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 23:22:27 +0100
> Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> > 13/03/2019 18:06, Natanael Copa:
> > > Add a fallback for non-GNU libc systems like musl libc for the
> > > non-standard functions outl_p, outw_p and outb_p.
> > >
> > > This ifixes the following buildtime errors when building with musl libc:
> > > pci_uio.c:(.text+0xaa1): undefined reference to `outw_p'
> > > pci_uio.c:(.text+0xac5): undefined reference to `outl_p'
> > > pci_uio.c:(.text+0xadf): undefined reference to `outb_p'
> > >
> > > fixes https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35
> >
> > Please use this syntax:
> > Bugzilla ID: 35
>
> Ok.
>
> >
> > [...]
> > > #if defined(RTE_ARCH_X86)
> > > #include <sys/io.h>
> > > +#if defined(__GLIBC__)
> > > +#define pci_uio_outl_p outl_p
> > > +#define pci_uio_outw_p outw_p
> > > +#define pci_uio_outb_p outb_p
> > > +#else
> > > +static inline void
> > > +pci_uio_outl_p(unsigned int value, unsigned short int port)
> > > +{
> > > + __asm__ __volatile__ ("outl %0,%w1\noutb %%al,$0x80" : : "a" (value),
> > > + "Nd" (port));
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline void
> > > +pci_uio_outw_p(unsigned short int value, unsigned short int port)
> > > +{
> > > + __asm__ __volatile__ ("outw %w0,%w1\noutb %%al,$0x80" : : "a" (value),
> > > + "Nd" (port));
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline void
> > > +pci_uio_outb_p(unsigned char value, unsigned short int port)
> > > +{
> > > + __asm__ __volatile__ ("outb %b0,%w1\noutb %%al,$0x80" : : "a" (value),
> > > + "Nd" (port));
> > > +}
> > > +#endif
> > > #endif
> > [...]
> > > #if defined(RTE_ARCH_X86)
> > > - outl_p(*(const uint32_t *)s, reg);
> > > + pci_uio_outl_p(*(const uint32_t *)s, reg);
> > > #else
> > > *(volatile uint32_t *)reg = *(const uint32_t *)s;
> > > #endif
> >
> > Could we manage non-x86 case in the macros pci_uio_out?
>
> I did that in separate commit. Do you want do both in same commit?
Maybe change the order of commits?
Anyway I think you need to rebase and resend this series :)
More information about the dev
mailing list