[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/49] net/ice/base: replay advanced rule after reset

Stillwell Jr, Paul M paul.m.stillwell.jr at intel.com
Wed Jun 5 17:53:34 CEST 2019


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin at redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2019 1:59 AM
> To: Rong, Leyi <leyi.rong at intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Raj, Victor <victor.raj at intel.com>; Stillwell Jr, Paul M
> <paul.m.stillwell.jr at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/49] net/ice/base: replay advanced rule
> after reset
> 
> 
> 
> On 6/4/19 7:42 AM, Leyi Rong wrote:
> > Code added to replay the advanced rule per VSI basis and remove the
> > advanced rule information from shared code recipe list.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Victor Raj <victor.raj at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul M Stillwell Jr <paul.m.stillwell.jr at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Leyi Rong <leyi.rong at intel.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> ----
> >   1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c
> > b/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c
> > index c53021aed..ca0497ca7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ice/base/ice_switch.c
> > @@ -3033,6 +3033,27 @@ ice_rem_sw_rule_info(struct ice_hw *hw,
> struct LIST_HEAD_TYPE *rule_head)
> >   	}
> >   }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * ice_rem_adv_rule_info
> > + * @hw: pointer to the hardware structure
> > + * @rule_head: pointer to the switch list structure that we want to
> > +delete  */ static void ice_rem_adv_rule_info(struct ice_hw *hw,
> > +struct LIST_HEAD_TYPE *rule_head) {
> > +	struct ice_adv_fltr_mgmt_list_entry *tmp_entry;
> > +	struct ice_adv_fltr_mgmt_list_entry *lst_itr;
> > +
> > +	if (LIST_EMPTY(rule_head))
> > +		return;
> 
> 
> Is it necessary? If the list is empty, LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY will not loop and
> status will be returned:
> 

Yes, the check is necessary. This code gets consumed by multiple different OSs and not all OSs implement the LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY_SAFE in the way that DPDK did. For example, if I'm understanding the Linux code correctly, the list_for_each_entry_safe code in Linux would not work correctly without checking LIST_EMPTY since the Linux implementation doesn't have a check for null in it's implementation of list_for_each_entry_safe.

So what the DPDK code should be doing is something more like the Linux implementation (since it is the most restrictive use) and not check for null in LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY_SAFE and assume the list is not empty, thus the check would be necessary in DPDK also.

The change to the DPDK implementation of LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY_SAFE would need to be a separate patch though so I think for now we should leave this code and work on a patch to change the DPDK implementation.

> #define LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY_SAFE(pos, tmp, head, type, member) \
> 	LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY(pos, head, type, member)
> 
> with:
> 
> #define LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY(pos, head, type, member)
> 	       \
> 	for ((pos) = (head)->lh_first ?					       \
> 		     container_of((head)->lh_first, struct type, member) :     \
> 		     0;							       \
> 	     (pos);							       \
> 	     (pos) = (pos)->member.next.le_next ?			       \
> 		     container_of((pos)->member.next.le_next, struct type,
> \
> 				  member) :				       \
> 		     0)
> 
> > +	LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY_SAFE(lst_itr, tmp_entry, rule_head,
> 
> > +				 ice_adv_fltr_mgmt_list_entry, list_entry) {
> > +		LIST_DEL(&lst_itr->list_entry);
> > +		ice_free(hw, lst_itr->lkups);
> > +		ice_free(hw, lst_itr);
> > +	}
> > +}
> >
> >   /**
> >    * ice_rem_all_sw_rules_info
> > @@ -3049,6 +3070,8 @@ void ice_rem_all_sw_rules_info(struct ice_hw
> *hw)
> >   		rule_head = &sw->recp_list[i].filt_rules;
> >   		if (!sw->recp_list[i].adv_rule)
> >   			ice_rem_sw_rule_info(hw, rule_head);
> > +		else
> > +			ice_rem_adv_rule_info(hw, rule_head);
> >   	}
> >   }
> >
> > @@ -5687,6 +5710,38 @@ ice_replay_vsi_fltr(struct ice_hw *hw, u16
> vsi_handle, u8 recp_id,
> >   	return status;
> >   }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * ice_replay_vsi_adv_rule - Replay advanced rule for requested VSI
> > + * @hw: pointer to the hardware structure
> > + * @vsi_handle: driver VSI handle
> > + * @list_head: list for which filters need to be replayed
> > + *
> > + * Replay the advanced rule for the given VSI.
> > + */
> > +static enum ice_status
> > +ice_replay_vsi_adv_rule(struct ice_hw *hw, u16 vsi_handle,
> > +			struct LIST_HEAD_TYPE *list_head)
> > +{
> > +	struct ice_rule_query_data added_entry = { 0 };
> > +	struct ice_adv_fltr_mgmt_list_entry *adv_fltr;
> > +	enum ice_status status = ICE_SUCCESS;
> > +
> > +	if (LIST_EMPTY(list_head))
> > +		return status;
> 
> Ditto, it should be removed.
> 
> > +	LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY(adv_fltr, list_head,
> ice_adv_fltr_mgmt_list_entry,
> > +			    list_entry) {
> > +		struct ice_adv_rule_info *rinfo = &adv_fltr->rule_info;
> > +		u16 lk_cnt = adv_fltr->lkups_cnt;
> > +
> > +		if (vsi_handle != rinfo->sw_act.vsi_handle)
> > +			continue;
> > +		status = ice_add_adv_rule(hw, adv_fltr->lkups, lk_cnt, rinfo,
> > +					  &added_entry);
> > +		if (status)
> > +			break;
> > +	}
> > +	return status;
> > +}
> >
> >   /**
> >    * ice_replay_vsi_all_fltr - replay all filters stored in
> > bookkeeping lists @@ -5698,23 +5753,23 @@ ice_replay_vsi_fltr(struct
> ice_hw *hw, u16 vsi_handle, u8 recp_id,
> >   enum ice_status ice_replay_vsi_all_fltr(struct ice_hw *hw, u16
> vsi_handle)
> >   {
> >   	struct ice_switch_info *sw = hw->switch_info;
> > -	enum ice_status status = ICE_SUCCESS;
> > +	enum ice_status status;
> >   	u8 i;
> >
> > +	/* Update the recipes that were created */
> >   	for (i = 0; i < ICE_MAX_NUM_RECIPES; i++) {
> > -		/* Update the default recipe lines and ones that were
> created */
> > -		if (i < ICE_MAX_NUM_RECIPES || sw-
> >recp_list[i].recp_created) {
> > -			struct LIST_HEAD_TYPE *head;
> > +		struct LIST_HEAD_TYPE *head;
> >
> > -			head = &sw->recp_list[i].filt_replay_rules;
> > -			if (!sw->recp_list[i].adv_rule)
> > -				status = ice_replay_vsi_fltr(hw, vsi_handle, i,
> > -							     head);
> > -			if (status != ICE_SUCCESS)
> > -				return status;
> > -		}
> > +		head = &sw->recp_list[i].filt_replay_rules;
> > +		if (!sw->recp_list[i].adv_rule)
> > +			status = ice_replay_vsi_fltr(hw, vsi_handle, i, head);
> > +		else
> > +			status = ice_replay_vsi_adv_rule(hw, vsi_handle,
> head);
> > +		if (status != ICE_SUCCESS)
> > +			return status;
> >   	}
> > -	return status;
> > +
> > +	return ICE_SUCCESS;
> >   }
> >
> >   /**
> > @@ -5738,6 +5793,8 @@ void ice_rm_all_sw_replay_rule_info(struct
> ice_hw *hw)
> >   			l_head = &sw->recp_list[i].filt_replay_rules;
> >   			if (!sw->recp_list[i].adv_rule)
> >   				ice_rem_sw_rule_info(hw, l_head);
> > +			else
> > +				ice_rem_adv_rule_info(hw, l_head);
> >   		}
> >   	}
> >   }
> >


More information about the dev mailing list