[dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH] cryptodev: extend api of asymmetric crypto by sessionless

Kusztal, ArkadiuszX arkadiuszx.kusztal at intel.com
Fri Jun 14 14:12:23 CEST 2019



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shally Verma [mailto:shallyv at marvell.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 1:23 PM
> To: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX <arkadiuszx.kusztal at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: akhil.goyal at nxp.com; Trahe, Fiona <fiona.trahe at intel.com>;
> shally.verma at caviumnetworks.com
> Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH] cryptodev: extend api of asymmetric crypto by
> sessionless
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX <arkadiuszx.kusztal at intel.com>
> > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 3:55 PM
> > To: Shally Verma <shallyv at marvell.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> > Cc: akhil.goyal at nxp.com; Trahe, Fiona <fiona.trahe at intel.com>;
> > shally.verma at caviumnetworks.com
> > Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH] cryptodev: extend api of asymmetric crypto
> > by sessionless
> >
> ...
> > > > [Shally] Ack to this change. But is this all that is needed to
> > > > support sessionless? Do you have working poc with sessionless?
> > > >
> > >
> > > [AK]
> > > xform holds to get working. Crypto_op holds sess_type From our side
> > > for now we not intend to store any user information in session at all.
> > > For sure not private keys, any other information is small enough
> > > comparing to asymmetric crypto computation time that it has no gain
> > > to allocate session for it.
> > >
> > [AK] Sorry, I had to fix bad writing.
> > rte_crypto_asym_xform holds enough information, and rte_crypto_op
> > holds sess_type.
> 
> Can you submit example app working on sessionless ?

[AK] Sure, I will.
> 
> > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Shally
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >  	__extension__
> > > > >  	union {
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.7.4



More information about the dev mailing list