[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/15] Unit tests fixes for CI
Bruce Richardson
bruce.richardson at intel.com
Mon Jun 17 13:17:13 CEST 2019
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 12:46:03PM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 12:02 PM Bruce Richardson
> <[1]bruce.richardson at intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 08:42:15AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> > This is a joint effort to make the unit tests ready for CI.
> > The first patches are fixes that I had accumulated.
> > Then the second part of the series focuses on skipping tests when
> some
> > requirements are not fulfilled so that we can start them in a
> restrained
> > environment like Travis virtual machines that gives us two cores
> and does
> > not have specific hw devices.
> >
> > We are still not ready for enabling those tests in Travis.
> > At least, the following issues remain:
> > - some fixes on librte_acl have not been merged yet [1],
> > - the tests on --file-prefix are still ko, and have been isolated
> in a
> > test that we could disable while waiting for the fixes,
> > - rwlock_autotest and hash_readwrite_lf_autotest are taking a
> little more
> > than 10s,
> > - librte_table unit test crashes on ipv6 [2],
> > - the "perf" tests are taking way too long for my taste,
> > - the shared build unit tests all fail when depending on mempool
> since
> > the mempool drivers are not loaded,
> >
> For the autotest app shared builds, it is probably worthwhile
> linking in
> all drivers explicitly to avoid issues like this.
>
> Yes, I'll look into this.
> While at it, do you know why the i40e and ixgbe drivers are linked to
> app/test in meson?
> --
There are unit tests for the device-specific functions in those drivers, so
they need to be given at link time.
/Bruce
More information about the dev
mailing list