[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix core dumped when setting txq or rxq to 0 in VF

Pei, Andy andy.pei at intel.com
Fri Jun 21 11:02:56 CEST 2019


HI

-----Original Message-----
From: Ye, Xiaolong 
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 7:42 PM
To: Pei, Andy <andy.pei at intel.com>
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Zhang, Helin <helin.zhang at intel.com>; stable at dpdk.org; Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zhang at intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang at intel.com>; Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu at intel.com>; Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing at intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>; Xu, Rosen <rosen.xu at intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix core dumped when setting txq or rxq to 0 in VF

On 06/21, Andy Pei wrote:
>Testpmd stucked and core dumped
>when set invalid VF queue number.
>This patch fix this issue.

It's better to wrap the commit message within 72 characters. Perhaps something
like:

Testpmd would stuck and result in core dump when user specifies an invalid VF queue number. This patch fixes this issue.

What do you think?
>
>Fixes: d6b19729093e ("i40evf: support configurable crc stripping")
>Cc: helin.zhang at intel.com
>Cc: stable at dpdk.org
>
>Signed-off-by: Andy Pei <andy.pei at intel.com>
>---
>Cc: roy.fan.zhang at intel.com
>Cc: qi.z.zhang at intel.com
>Cc: jingjing.wu at intel.com
>Cc: beilei.xing at intel.com
>Cc: ferruh.yigit at intel.com
>Cc: rosen.xu at intel.com
>
> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 35 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c 
>b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
>index 63dbe14..7096cc5 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
>@@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ struct rte_i40evf_xstats_name_off {  {
> 	txq_info->vsi_id = vsi_id;
> 	txq_info->queue_id = queue_id;
>-	if (queue_id < nb_txq) {
>+	if ((queue_id < nb_txq) && txq) {
> 		txq_info->ring_len = txq->nb_tx_desc;
> 		txq_info->dma_ring_addr = txq->tx_ring_phys_addr;
> 	}
>@@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ struct rte_i40evf_xstats_name_off {
> 	rxq_info->vsi_id = vsi_id;
> 	rxq_info->queue_id = queue_id;
> 	rxq_info->max_pkt_size = max_pkt_size;
>-	if (queue_id < nb_rxq) {
>+	if ((queue_id < nb_rxq) && rxq) {
> 		rxq_info->ring_len = rxq->nb_rx_desc;
> 		rxq_info->dma_ring_addr = rxq->rx_ring_phys_addr;
> 		rxq_info->databuffer_size =
>@@ -622,11 +622,32 @@ struct rte_i40evf_xstats_name_off {
> 	vc_vqci->num_queue_pairs = nb_qp;
> 
> 	for (i = 0, vc_qpi = vc_vqci->qpair; i < nb_qp; i++, vc_qpi++) {
>-		i40evf_fill_virtchnl_vsi_txq_info(&vc_qpi->txq,
>-			vc_vqci->vsi_id, i, dev->data->nb_tx_queues, txq[i]);
>-		i40evf_fill_virtchnl_vsi_rxq_info(&vc_qpi->rxq,
>-			vc_vqci->vsi_id, i, dev->data->nb_rx_queues,
>-					vf->max_pkt_len, rxq[i]);
>+		if (!txq)
>+			i40evf_fill_virtchnl_vsi_txq_info(&vc_qpi->txq,
>+							vc_vqci->vsi_id,
>+							i,
>+							dev->data->nb_tx_queues,
>+							NULL);
>+		else
>+			i40evf_fill_virtchnl_vsi_txq_info(&vc_qpi->txq,
>+							vc_vqci->vsi_id,
>+							i,
>+							dev->data->nb_tx_queues,
>+							txq[i]);
>+		if (!rxq)
>+			i40evf_fill_virtchnl_vsi_rxq_info(&vc_qpi->rxq,
>+							vc_vqci->vsi_id,
>+							i,
>+							dev->data->nb_rx_queues,
>+							vf->max_pkt_len,
>+							NULL);
>+		else
>+			i40evf_fill_virtchnl_vsi_rxq_info(&vc_qpi->rxq,
>+							vc_vqci->vsi_id,
>+							i,
>+							dev->data->nb_rx_queues,
>+							vf->max_pkt_len,
>+							rxq[i]);

No need to use one line for each parameter, I think you can still use the old format.

A tab is added at the beginning of the line, so the old format will exceed 80 characters.
So I suggests for use a new format but not one line for each parameter.
A new line comes if the upper line is more than 80 characters.
I will do this in v3

Thanks,
Xiaolong
> 	}
> 	memset(&args, 0, sizeof(args));
> 	args.ops = VIRTCHNL_OP_CONFIG_VSI_QUEUES;
>--
>1.8.3.1
>


More information about the dev mailing list