[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] test/rcu: increase the size of num cores variable
Honnappa Nagarahalli
honnappa.nagarahalli at arm.com
Fri Jun 28 18:35:48 CEST 2019
num_cores is of type uint8_t. This results in the following
compilation error.
test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c:649:16: error: comparison is always false
due to limited range of data type [-Werror=type-limits]
if (num_cores >= RTE_MAX_LCORE) {
^~
RTE_MAX_LCORE is set to 256 for armv8 config.
Fixes: e6a14121f4ae ("test/rcu: remove arbitrary limit on max core count")
Cc: stable at dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli at arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang at arm.com>
---
v2
- Changed type of num_cores to 'unsigned int' and
related changes (David/Thomas)
app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c | 8 ++++----
app/test/test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c | 16 ++++++++--------
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c b/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c
index 943a1e370..ae359a987 100644
--- a/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c
+++ b/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
#define TEST_RCU_QSBR_CNT_INIT 1
uint16_t enabled_core_ids[RTE_MAX_LCORE];
-uint8_t num_cores;
+unsigned int num_cores;
static uint32_t *keys;
#define TOTAL_ENTRY (1024 * 8)
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_synchronize_reader(void *arg)
static int
test_rcu_qsbr_synchronize(void)
{
- int i;
+ unsigned int i;
printf("\nTest rte_rcu_qsbr_synchronize()\n");
@@ -890,8 +890,8 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_sw_sv_3qs(void)
static int
test_rcu_qsbr_mw_mv_mqs(void)
{
- int i, j;
- uint8_t test_cores;
+ unsigned int i, j;
+ unsigned int test_cores;
writer_done = 0;
test_cores = num_cores / 4;
diff --git a/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c b/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c
index 363365f46..a085db852 100644
--- a/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c
+++ b/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
/* Check condition and return an error if true. */
static uint16_t enabled_core_ids[RTE_MAX_LCORE];
-static uint8_t num_cores;
+static unsigned int num_cores;
static uint32_t *keys;
#define TOTAL_ENTRY (1024 * 8)
@@ -125,8 +125,8 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_writer_perf(void *arg)
static int
test_rcu_qsbr_perf(void)
{
- int i, sz;
- int tmp_num_cores;
+ unsigned int i, sz;
+ unsigned int tmp_num_cores;
writer_done = 0;
@@ -188,8 +188,8 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_perf(void)
static int
test_rcu_qsbr_rperf(void)
{
- int i, sz;
- int tmp_num_cores;
+ unsigned int i, sz;
+ unsigned int tmp_num_cores;
rte_atomic64_clear(&updates);
rte_atomic64_clear(&update_cycles);
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ test_rcu_qsbr_rperf(void)
static int
test_rcu_qsbr_wperf(void)
{
- int i, sz;
+ unsigned int i, sz;
rte_atomic64_clear(&checks);
rte_atomic64_clear(&check_cycles);
@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static int
test_rcu_qsbr_sw_sv_1qs(void)
{
uint64_t token, begin, cycles;
- int i, j, tmp_num_cores, sz;
+ unsigned int i, j, tmp_num_cores, sz;
int32_t pos;
writer_done = 0;
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static int
test_rcu_qsbr_sw_sv_1qs_non_blocking(void)
{
uint64_t token, begin, cycles;
- int i, j, ret, tmp_num_cores, sz;
+ unsigned int i, j, ret, tmp_num_cores, sz;
int32_t pos;
writer_done = 0;
--
2.17.1
More information about the dev
mailing list