[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] net/failsafe: support secondary process
Raslan Darawsheh
rasland at mellanox.com
Tue Mar 5 10:33:44 CET 2019
Hi Stephen,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 7:25 PM
> To: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland at mellanox.com>
> Cc: gaetan.rivet at 6wind.com; dev at dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon
> <thomas at monjalon.net>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] net/failsafe: support secondary process
>
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 15:49:28 +0000
> Raslan Darawsheh <rasland at mellanox.com> wrote:
>
> > + eth_dev->rx_pkt_burst =
> (eth_rx_burst_t)&failsafe_rx_burst;
> > + eth_dev->tx_pkt_burst =
> (eth_tx_burst_t)&failsafe_tx_burst;
>
> Why is cast necessary here. The function signature should match.
I don't think it's necessary, but this is the same as the primary process implementation
Kindest regards
Raslan Darawsheh
More information about the dev
mailing list