[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] test/hash: add test for 'free key with position'

[Wang, Yipeng1]

Hi, thanks for the patch!
Reply inlined:

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dharmik Thakkar [mailto:dharmik.thakkar at arm.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 9:51 AM
>To: Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang at intel.com>; Gobriel, Sameh <sameh.gobriel at intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce
><bruce.richardson at intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com>
>Cc: dev at dpdk.org; honnappa.nagarahalli at arm.com; zhongdahulinfan at 163.com; Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar at arm.com>
>Subject: [PATCH 2/2] test/hash: add test for 'free key with position'
>
>This patch adds a unit test for rte_hash_free_key_with_position().
>
>Suggested-by: Linfan <zhongdahulinfan at 163.com>
>Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar at arm.com>
>---
> app/test/test_hash.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/app/test/test_hash.c b/app/test/test_hash.c
>index 390fbef87f42..a6949f2579a2 100644
>--- a/app/test/test_hash.c
>+++ b/app/test/test_hash.c
>@@ -481,6 +481,87 @@ static int test_add_update_delete_free(void)
> 	return 0;
> }
>
>+/*
>+ * Sequence of operations for a single key with 'rw concurrency lock free' set:
>+ *	- add
>+ *	- delete: hit
>+ *	- free: hit
>+ * Repeat the test case when 'multi writer add' is enabled.
>+ *	- add
>+ *	- delete: hit
>+ *	- free: hit
>+ */
>+static int test_add_delete_free_lf(void)
>+{
>+#define LCORE_CACHE_SIZE	64
[Wang, Yipeng]  We could say this should match the #define LCORE_CACHE_SIZE value in rte_cuckoo_hash.h
I also found the #define BUCKET_ENTRIES 4 in this file without comment. I think it should match #define RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES
Which is supposed to be 8? If so please add a commit for bug fix.

>+	struct rte_hash *handle;
>+	hash_sig_t hash_value;
>+	int pos, expectedPos, delPos;
>+	uint8_t extra_flag;
>+	uint32_t i, ip_src;
>+
>+	extra_flag = ut_params.extra_flag;
>+	ut_params.extra_flag = RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF;
>+	handle = rte_hash_create(&ut_params);
>+	RETURN_IF_ERROR(handle == NULL, "hash creation failed");
>+	ut_params.extra_flag = extra_flag;
>+
 [Wang, Yipeng]  Here we could say:" The number of iterations is at least the same as the number of slots rte_hash allocates internally. This is to
Reveal potential issues of not freeing keys successfully."
Same for the other loop.

>+	for (i = 0; i < ut_params.entries + 1; i++) {
>+		hash_value = rte_hash_hash(handle, &keys[0]);
>+		pos = rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(handle, &keys[0], hash_value);
>+		print_key_info("Add", &keys[0], pos);
>+		RETURN_IF_ERROR(pos < 0, "failed to add key (pos=%d)", pos);
..

Thanks
Yipeng