[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] librte_net: define TCP flags in rte_tcp.h instead of in rte_eth_ctrl.h
Ferruh Yigit
ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Mon May 13 19:00:07 CEST 2019
On 5/13/2019 4:15 PM, Morten Brørup wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger
>> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2019 4:47 PM
>> To: Morten Brørup
>> Cc: Olivier Matz; thomas at monjalon.net; ferruh.yigit at intel.com;
>> arybchenko at solarflare.com; dev at dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] librte_net: define TCP flags in rte_tcp.h
>> instead of in rte_eth_ctrl.h
>>
>> On Mon, 13 May 2019 15:02:57 +0200
>> Morten Brørup <mb at smartsharesystems.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> IMHO, adding the copyright for flags move is a bit overkill.
>>>
>>> I also added the two ECN flags and descriptions of all the flags. And
>> removed the misleading ALL flag.
>>>
>>> I don't know the formal or customary threshold criteria for adding a
>> copyright notice, so I just added it. It's our first direct contribution
>> where we didn't just send the corrections to another contributor, so I
>> thought it would be nice to have our name in here. You're the maintainer,
>> so I'll leave the final decision up to you.
>>
>> Most projects including DPDK do not add additional copyrights unless it
>> is a complete rewrite. Please don't clutter the code with this stuff.
>
> That's a quite clear threshold definition, and my modifications clearly don't fall into this category.
I think in the past threshold has been mentioned as "significant contribution",
although this is kind of vague, it sounds lighter than "complete rewrite",
anyway I agree for this patch it looks overkill to claim the copyright.
>
> Med venlig hilsen / kind regards
> - Morten Brørup
>
More information about the dev
mailing list