[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: add option --iso-cmem for external custom memory

[Rajesh Ravi]

Thanks David.

With Anatoly's patch applied my patch is not needed as the purpose is
solved.

Regards,
Rajesh


On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 9:21 PM David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 2:55 PM David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 6:14 PM Burakov, Anatoly
> > <anatoly.burakov at intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 05-Nov-19 3:18 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> > > > On 05-Nov-19 2:10 PM, Rajesh Ravi wrote:
> > > >> Thanks a lot Anatoly.
> > > >> Will the same solution work with  DPDK 19.02 as well? We 're
> actually
> > > >> using DPDK 19.02 for memory allocations for SPDK 19.07.
> > > >> DPDK 19.11 may not be supported by SPDK 19.07 we 're currently
> using.
> > > >>
> > > >> I 'll definitely test if the patch works with DPDK 19.02
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks again for your time and help.
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Rajesh
> > > >
> > > > Hi Rajesh,
> > > >
> > > > Please test the patch [1] and see if it works for you. The patch is
> not
> > > > intended for 19.02 (in fact, 19.02 is not even supported any more),
> but
> > > > it may still apply. In the meantime, i'm working on a different patch
> > > > for 18.11, that will achieve the same thing using different means.
> > > >
> > > > [1] http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/62468/
> > > >
> > >
> > > The following is an alternative implementation that is based off 18.11:
> > >
> > > http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/62486/
> >
>
> Thanks Rajesh, following your test report, I applied Anatoly patch.
> A backport will go to 18.11.
>
> I will mark this current proposal as rejected.
> If you think it should still be considered, then please set this patch
> state back to new in patchwork and explain what is missing in this
> thread.
>
>
> Thanks.
> --
> David Marchand
>
>

-- 
Regards,
Rajesh