[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/8] examples/performance-thread: rename directory to standard

[Bruce Richardson]

On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 09:46:50PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 5:05 PM Bruce Richardson
> <bruce.richardson at intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > In other places in DPDK, e.g. EAL, the architecture-specific files for arm
> > are just stored in a folder called "arm". Rename the "arm64" folder for
> > performance thread example to align to this naming.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  examples/performance-thread/common/arch/{arm64 => arm}/ctx.c   | 0
> >  examples/performance-thread/common/arch/{arm64 => arm}/ctx.h   | 0
> >  examples/performance-thread/common/arch/{arm64 => arm}/stack.h | 0
> >  examples/performance-thread/common/common.mk                   | 2 +-
> >  4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >  rename examples/performance-thread/common/arch/{arm64 => arm}/ctx.c (100%)
> 
> This code only works for arm64 as it is storing and restoring arm64 registers.
> armv7 registers are different so this code does not work for the generic arm.
> 
> arm64 specific code, we always named as arm64
> 
> F: lib/librte_hash/rte*_arm64.h
> F: lib/librte_efd/rte*_arm64.h
> F: lib/librte_table/rte*_arm64.h
> 
> IMO, If armv7 support adds in future then we can change the directory
> as arch/arm
> and have ctx_64.c and ctx_32.c etc. I think, for now, technically it
> is correct to call the directory as arm64

Ok, fair enough. The code isn't meant to build for ARMv7 so I thought I'd
save some logic by just using x86 and arm, rather than having to compute
the directory names individually.

I'll rework the patch.

/Bruce