[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bus/fslmc: fix for resource leak coverity issue

[David Marchand]

On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 10:43 AM Sachin Saxena <sachin.saxena at nxp.com> wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Babu Radhakrishnan, AgalyaX
> > <agalyax.babu.radhakrishnan at intel.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 1:11 PM
> > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > Cc: Pattan, Reshma <reshma.pattan at intel.com>; Hemant Agrawal
> > <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>; Sachin Saxena <sachin.saxena at nxp.com>;
> > Parthasarathy, JananeeX M <jananeex.m.parthasarathy at intel.com>;
> > stable at dpdk.org
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH] bus/fslmc: fix for resource leak coverity issue
> > Importance: High
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Babu Radhakrishnan, AgalyaX
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 1:01 PM
> > > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > > Cc: Pattan, Reshma <reshma.pattan at intel.com>;
> > hemant.agrawal at nxp.com;
> > > sachin.saxena at nxp.com; Parthasarathy, JananeeX M
> > > <jananeex.m.parthasarathy at intel.com>; Babu Radhakrishnan, AgalyaX
> > > <agalyax.babu.radhakrishnan at intel.com>; stable at dpdk.org
> > > Subject: [PATCH] bus/fslmc: fix for resource leak coverity issue
> > >
> > > From: Agalya Babu RadhaKrishnan
> > <agalyax.babu.radhakrishnan at intel.com>
> > >
> > > 1 issue caught by 344967
> > > Leaked_storage: Variable sep going out of scope leaks the storage it
> > > points to.
> > >
> > > When 'sep' is not null and sep_exist is 0, 'sep' is freed before going
> > > out of scope of the function irrespective of 'addr' exists or not.
> > >
> > > Coverity Issue: 344967
> > > Fixes: e67a61614d0b ("bus/fslmc: support device iteration")
> > > Cc: stable at dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Agalya Babu RadhaKrishnan
> > > <agalyax.babu.radhakrishnan at intel.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > if (strncmp("dpni", sep, 4) &&
> >             strncmp("dpseci", sep, 6) &&
> >             strncmp("dpcon", sep, 5) &
> >             .....
> >
> > We think validation of device name is done using AND operator instead it
> > should be done by OR operator.
> > Please confirm
> [Sachin Saxena] The purpose of this logic to confirm that one of the device name should match to supported list and as soon as one strncmp() matches the string it will return 0 and the control comes out of IF condition.
> So, existing logic is correct.
>

Should I understand this as a confirmation of the initial ACK?


-- 
David Marchand