[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: set default

[Iremonger, Bernard]

Hi Akhil,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal at nxp.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 4:05 PM
> To: Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremonger at intel.com>; Thomas Monjalon
> <thomas at monjalon.net>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>;
> anoobj at marvell.com; jerinj at marvell.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: set default
> 
> 
> 
> > > >
> > > > 11/10/2019 14:40, Akhil Goyal:
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > This patchset would need ack from more vendors as it will impact
> > > > > user
> > > > experience
> > > > > on a key example application which is normally demonstrated to
> > > customers.
> > > > >
> > > > > IPSec library is still evolving and there are new functionality
> > > > > added every
> > > > release.
> > > > > Atleast from NXP side we are not OK with this change.
> > > >
> > > > What can be changed in the library to make it acceptable as a
> > > > default in this example?
> > > >
> > >
> > > We are observing performance issues with ipsec library. So would
> > > request other Vendors to confirm if they are OK with the performance
> numbers.
> >
> > Could you give some details on the performance issues you are seeing.
> >
> 
> We were observing about 4-5% drop when using the ipsec-lib instead of the
> Legacy code path. We would again measure it on RC1. That is why I say, I will
> Hold this patch till RC2, unless some other vendor also confirms that.

Is there any update on performance measurements on 19.11-rc1 ?

Regards,

Bernard.