[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] raw/ntb: setup ntb queue
Wu, Jingjing
jingjing.wu at intel.com
Mon Sep 23 04:50:07 CEST 2019
<...>
> +static void
> +ntb_rxq_release(struct ntb_rx_queue *rxq)
> +{
> + if (!rxq) {
> + NTB_LOG(ERR, "Pointer to rxq is NULL");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + ntb_rxq_release_mbufs(rxq);
> +
> + rte_free(rxq->sw_ring);
> + rte_free(rxq);
It' better to free rxq out of this function, as the point of param "rxq" cannot be set to NULL in this func.
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +ntb_rxq_setup(struct rte_rawdev *dev,
> + uint16_t qp_id,
> + rte_rawdev_obj_t queue_conf)
> +{
> + struct ntb_queue_conf *rxq_conf = queue_conf;
> + struct ntb_hw *hw = dev->dev_private;
> + struct ntb_rx_queue *rxq;
> +
> + /* Allocate the rx queue data structure */
> + rxq = rte_zmalloc_socket("ntb rx queue",
> + sizeof(struct ntb_rx_queue),
> + RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE,
> + dev->socket_id);
> + if (!rxq) {
> + NTB_LOG(ERR, "Failed to allocate memory for "
> + "rx queue data structure.");
> + return -ENOMEM;
Need to free rxq here.
<...>
> +static void
> +ntb_txq_release(struct ntb_tx_queue *txq)
> {
> + if (!txq) {
> + NTB_LOG(ERR, "Pointer to txq is NULL");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + ntb_txq_release_mbufs(txq);
> +
> + rte_free(txq->sw_ring);
> + rte_free(txq);
The same as above "ntb_rxq_release".
<...>
> +static int
> +ntb_queue_setup(struct rte_rawdev *dev,
> + uint16_t queue_id,
> + rte_rawdev_obj_t queue_conf)
> +{
> + struct ntb_hw *hw = dev->dev_private;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (queue_id > hw->queue_pairs)
Should be ">=" ?
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = ntb_txq_setup(dev, queue_id, queue_conf);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = ntb_rxq_setup(dev, queue_id, queue_conf);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int
> -ntb_queue_release(struct rte_rawdev *dev __rte_unused,
> - uint16_t queue_id __rte_unused)
> +ntb_queue_release(struct rte_rawdev *dev, uint16_t queue_id)
> {
> + struct ntb_hw *hw = dev->dev_private;
> + struct ntb_tx_queue *txq;
> + struct ntb_rx_queue *rxq;
> +
> + if (queue_id > hw->queue_pairs)
Should be ">=" ?
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + txq = hw->tx_queues[queue_id];
> + rxq = hw->rx_queues[queue_id];
> + ntb_txq_release(txq);
> + ntb_rxq_release(rxq);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -234,6 +470,77 @@ ntb_queue_count(struct rte_rawdev *dev)
> return hw->queue_pairs;
> }
>
> +static int
> +ntb_queue_init(struct rte_rawdev *dev, uint16_t qp_id)
> +{
> + struct ntb_hw *hw = dev->dev_private;
> + struct ntb_rx_queue *rxq = hw->rx_queues[qp_id];
> + struct ntb_tx_queue *txq = hw->tx_queues[qp_id];
> + volatile struct ntb_header *local_hdr;
> + struct ntb_header *remote_hdr;
> + uint16_t q_size = hw->queue_size;
> + uint32_t hdr_offset;
> + void *bar_addr;
> + uint16_t i;
> +
> + if (hw->ntb_ops->get_peer_mw_addr == NULL) {
> + NTB_LOG(ERR, "Failed to get mapped peer addr.");
Would it be better to log as "XX ops is not supported" to keep consistent as others?
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* Put queue info into the start of shared memory. */
> + hdr_offset = hw->hdr_size_per_queue * qp_id;
> + local_hdr = (volatile struct ntb_header *)
> + ((size_t)hw->mz[0]->addr + hdr_offset);
> + bar_addr = (*hw->ntb_ops->get_peer_mw_addr)(dev, 0);
> + if (bar_addr == NULL)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + remote_hdr = (struct ntb_header *)
> + ((size_t)bar_addr + hdr_offset);
> +
> + /* rxq init. */
> + rxq->rx_desc_ring = (struct ntb_desc *)
> + (&remote_hdr->desc_ring);
> + rxq->rx_used_ring = (volatile struct ntb_used *)
> + (&local_hdr->desc_ring[q_size]);
> + rxq->avail_cnt = &remote_hdr->avail_cnt;
> + rxq->used_cnt = &local_hdr->used_cnt;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < rxq->nb_rx_desc - 1; i++) {
> + struct rte_mbuf *mbuf = rte_mbuf_raw_alloc(rxq->mpool);
> + if (unlikely(!mbuf)) {
> + NTB_LOG(ERR, "Failed to allocate mbuf for RX");
Need release mbufs allocated here or in " ntb_dev_start".
<...>
> + hw->hdr_size_per_queue = RTE_ALIGN(sizeof(struct ntb_header) +
> + hw->queue_size * sizeof(struct ntb_desc) +
> + hw->queue_size * sizeof(struct ntb_used),
> + RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE);
hw->hdr_size_per_queue is internal information, why put the assignment in ntb_dev_info_get?
> + info->ntb_hdr_size = hw->hdr_size_per_queue * hw->queue_pairs;
> }
>
> static int
> -ntb_dev_configure(const struct rte_rawdev *dev __rte_unused,
> - rte_rawdev_obj_t config __rte_unused)
> +ntb_dev_configure(const struct rte_rawdev *dev, rte_rawdev_obj_t config)
> {
> + struct ntb_dev_config *conf = config;
> + struct ntb_hw *hw = dev->dev_private;
> + int ret;
> +
> + hw->queue_pairs = conf->num_queues;
> + hw->queue_size = conf->queue_size;
> + hw->used_mw_num = conf->mz_num;
> + hw->mz = conf->mz_list;
> + hw->rx_queues = rte_zmalloc("ntb_rx_queues",
> + sizeof(struct ntb_rx_queue *) * hw->queue_pairs, 0);
> + hw->tx_queues = rte_zmalloc("ntb_tx_queues",
> + sizeof(struct ntb_tx_queue *) * hw->queue_pairs, 0);
> +
> + /* Start handshake with the peer. */
> + ret = ntb_handshake_work(dev);
> + if (ret < 0)
Free?
> + return ret;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -337,21 +637,52 @@ static int
> ntb_dev_start(struct rte_rawdev *dev)
> {
> struct ntb_hw *hw = dev->dev_private;
> - int ret, i;
> + uint32_t peer_base_l, peer_val;
> + uint64_t peer_base_h;
> + uint32_t i;
> + int ret;
>
> - /* TODO: init queues and start queues. */
> + if (!hw->link_status || !hw->peer_dev_up)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> - /* Map memory of bar_size to remote. */
> - hw->mz = rte_zmalloc("struct rte_memzone *",
> - hw->mw_cnt * sizeof(struct rte_memzone *), 0);
> - for (i = 0; i < hw->mw_cnt; i++) {
> - ret = ntb_set_mw(dev, i, hw->mw_size[i]);
> + for (i = 0; i < hw->queue_pairs; i++) {
> + ret = ntb_queue_init(dev, i);
> if (ret) {
> - NTB_LOG(ERR, "Fail to set mw.");
> + NTB_LOG(ERR, "Failed to init queue.");
Free when error.
<...>
> +struct ntb_used {
> + uint16_t len; /* buffer length */
> +#define NTB_FLAG_EOP 1 /* end of packet */
Better to
> + uint16_t flags; /* flags */
> +};
> +
> +struct ntb_rx_entry {
> + struct rte_mbuf *mbuf;
> +};
> +
> +struct ntb_rx_queue {
> + struct ntb_desc *rx_desc_ring;
> + volatile struct ntb_used *rx_used_ring;
> + uint16_t *avail_cnt;
> + volatile uint16_t *used_cnt;
> + uint16_t last_avail;
> + uint16_t last_used;
> + uint16_t nb_rx_desc;
> +
> + uint16_t rx_free_thresh;
> +
> + struct rte_mempool *mpool; /**< mempool for mbuf allocation */
Generally comments: comments in internal header doesn't need to be wrapped with "/**< */", keep consistent in one file would be nice.
More information about the dev
mailing list