[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/1] bus/pci: probe PCI devices in whitelisted order
Slava Ovsiienko
viacheslavo at mellanox.com
Wed Sep 25 08:41:36 CEST 2019
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-bounces at dpdk.org> On Behalf Of vattunuru at marvell.com
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 14:57
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: gaetan.rivet at 6wind.com; ferruh.yigit at intel.com;
> anatoly.burakov at intel.com; Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>;
> jerinj at marvell.com; Vamsi Attunuru <vattunuru at marvell.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/1] bus/pci: probe PCI devices in whitelisted
> order
>
> From: Vamsi Attunuru <vattunuru at marvell.com>
>
> Current pci bus driver scans pci devices in the order that it read from sysfs.
> Accordingly all or whitelisted devices are getting probed.
>
> Patch modifies the probing order of whitelisted pci devices in a sequence the
> devices are whitelisted(using EAL flags).
Thanks, it would be nice to have opportunity to control probing order,
it might be useful for bonded devices and representors either.
Acked-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo at mellanox.com>
>
> It ensures the eth devices that application uses are probed in device
> whitelisted sequence, in turn it facilitates the packet forwarding applications
> to work without any packet loss or performance drop when the underneath
> network ports have different bandwidths. By altering the whitelist order
> applications like testpmd, l2fwd can forward the ingress traffic to egress port
> that has of equivalent bandwidth.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vamsi Attunuru <vattunuru at marvell.com>
> ---
> drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> ----------
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c b/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c
> index 6b46b4f..c27a0e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c
> @@ -293,32 +293,57 @@ rte_pci_probe(void)
> struct rte_pci_device *dev = NULL;
> size_t probed = 0, failed = 0;
> struct rte_devargs *devargs;
> - int probe_all = 0;
> + struct rte_pci_addr addr;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - if (rte_pci_bus.bus.conf.scan_mode != RTE_BUS_SCAN_WHITELIST)
> - probe_all = 1;
> -
> - FOREACH_DEVICE_ON_PCIBUS(dev) {
> - probed++;
> + if (rte_pci_bus.bus.conf.scan_mode != RTE_BUS_SCAN_WHITELIST) {
> + /* Probe all devices */
> + FOREACH_DEVICE_ON_PCIBUS(dev) {
> + probed++;
>
> - devargs = dev->device.devargs;
> - /* probe all or only whitelisted devices */
> - if (probe_all)
> ret = pci_probe_all_drivers(dev);
> - else if (devargs != NULL &&
> - devargs->policy == RTE_DEV_WHITELISTED)
> - ret = pci_probe_all_drivers(dev);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - if (ret != -EEXIST) {
> - RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Requested device "
> - PCI_PRI_FMT " cannot be used\n",
> - dev->addr.domain, dev->addr.bus,
> - dev->addr.devid, dev-
> >addr.function);
> - rte_errno = errno;
> - failed++;
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + if (ret != -EEXIST) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Requested
> device "
> + PCI_PRI_FMT " cannot be
> used\n",
> + dev->addr.domain, dev-
> >addr.bus,
> + dev->addr.devid,
> + dev->addr.function);
> + rte_errno = errno;
> + failed++;
> + }
> + ret = 0;
> + }
> + }
> + } else {
> + /* Probe only whitelisted devices */
> + RTE_EAL_DEVARGS_FOREACH("pci", devargs) {
> + if (devargs->policy != RTE_DEV_WHITELISTED)
> + continue;
> +
> + devargs->bus->parse(devargs->name, &addr);
> +
> + FOREACH_DEVICE_ON_PCIBUS(dev) {
> + if (rte_pci_addr_cmp(&dev->addr, &addr))
> + continue;
> + probed++;
> + ret = pci_probe_all_drivers(dev);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + if (ret != -EEXIST) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL,
> + "Requested device "
> + PCI_PRI_FMT
> + "cannot be used\n",
> + dev->addr.domain,
> + dev->addr.bus,
> + dev->addr.devid,
> + dev->addr.function);
> + rte_errno = errno;
> + failed++;
> + }
> + ret = 0;
> + }
> }
> - ret = 0;
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.8.4
More information about the dev
mailing list