[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] net/af_xdp: support pinning of IRQs
Ye Xiaolong
xiaolong.ye at intel.com
Fri Sep 27 16:06:49 CEST 2019
On 09/27, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
>[snip]
>
>> >+
>> >+static void
>> >+configure_irqs(struct pmd_internals *internals, uint16_t rx_queue_id)
>> >+{
>> >+ int coreid = internals->queue_irqs[rx_queue_id];
>> >+ char driver[NAME_MAX];
>> >+ uint16_t netdev_qid = rx_queue_id + internals->start_queue_idx;
>> >+ regex_t r;
>> >+ int interrupt;
>> >+
>> >+ if (coreid < 0)
>> >+ return;
>> >+
>> >+ if (coreid > (get_nprocs() - 1)) {
>> >+ AF_XDP_LOG(ERR, "Affinitisation failed - invalid coreid %i\n",
>> >+ coreid);
>> >+ return;
>> >+ }
>>
>> I think we can combine above 2 sanity checks together.
>>
>
>Hi Xiaolong,
>
>Thanks for your review. I agree with all of your feedback except this one.
>
>configure_irqs() is called for every queue. The queues with no affinity have a coreid initialized to -1. So coreid < 0 is a valid value and we should return with no error. However for the case where coreid > nprocs, this is an actual error and we should report that with a log.
>What do you think?
It makes sense, thanks for the explanation.
Thanks,
Xiaolong
>
>Thanks,
>Ciara
>
>[snip]
>
>> >@@ -697,6 +996,8 @@ eth_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>> > goto err;
>> > }
>> >
>> >+ configure_irqs(internals, rx_queue_id);
>> >+
>> > rxq->fds[0].fd = xsk_socket__fd(rxq->xsk);
>> > rxq->fds[0].events = POLLIN;
>> >
>> >@@ -834,6 +1135,39 @@ parse_name_arg(const char *key __rte_unused,
>> > return 0;
>> > }
>> >
>
More information about the dev
mailing list