[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 1/5] net/tap: fix mbuf double free when writev fails
Ferruh Yigit
ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Fri Apr 10 09:45:26 CEST 2020
On 4/10/2020 2:41 AM, wangyunjian wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2020 10:51 PM
>> To: wangyunjian <wangyunjian at huawei.com>
>> Cc: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org;
>> keith.wiles at intel.com; Lilijun (Jerry) <jerry.lilijun at huawei.com>; xudingke
>> <xudingke at huawei.com>; stable at dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 1/5] net/tap: fix mbuf double
>> free when writev fails
>>
>> On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 08:03:23 +0000
>> wangyunjian <wangyunjian at huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>>> error = tap_write_mbufs(txq, num_mbufs, mbuf,
>>> &num_packets, &num_tx_bytes); if (error == -1) {
>>> txq->stats.errs++;
>>> /* free tso mbufs */
>>> for (j = 0; j < ret; j++)
>>> rte_pktmbuf_free(mbuf[j]);
>>> break;
>>> }
>>
>> There is a free bulk, and normally each buf counts against errors.
>>
>> if (error == -1) {
>> txq->stats.errs += num_packets;
>
> I think to consider only the original packet number, not sent packets.
+1. 'mubf' here is the output of the 'rte_gso_segment()', the number of mbuf
application sent is 1.
>
>> rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(mbuf, num_packets);
>
> Thanks for your suggestion, will include it in next version.
>
> Yunjian
>> break;
>> }
>
More information about the dev
mailing list