[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] fix lacp check system address
Ferruh Yigit
ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Fri Apr 10 12:24:12 CEST 2020
On 4/10/2020 11:21 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/10/2020 11:15 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 11/26/2019 3:09 PM, podovinnikov wrote:
>>> Hi Ferruh
>>>
>>>> This is bonding patch, please cc bonding maintainers (Chas, instead of John W.
>>>> Linville).
>>> Sorry about that. I have 2 patches ( one for af packet, one for bonding).
>>>
>>> I am a little confused.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Can you please give more details, what is failing what is the impact etc.
>>>
>>> In bond (lacp) we have several nics ( ports )
>>>
>>> When we have negotiation with peer about what port we prefer,
>>>
>>> we send information about what system we preferred in partner system
>>> name field.
>>>
>>> Peer also sends us what partner system name it prefer.
>>>
>>> When we receive a message from it we must compare its preferred
>>>
>>> system name with our system name, but not with our port mac address
>>>
>>> In my test I have several problems with that
>>>
>>> 1. If master port (mac address same as system address)
>>>
>>> shuts down (I have two ports) I loose connection
>>>
>>> 2. If secondary port (mac address not same as system address)
>>>
>>> receives message before master port, my connection is not established.
>>
>> Hi Vadim,
>>
>> Thanks for the info and sorry for late response, it is sitting in backlog for a
>> long time now.
>>
>> @Chas, do you have any objection on the fix, if not I am planning to merge it soon.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> ferruh
>
> cc'ed Xavier, he also has a bonding patch in the backlog waiting for review [1].
>
>
> Vadim, Xavier,
>
> Since you both send bonding patches, I assume you both know about bonding at
> some level, at least more than me, so would you mind reviewing eachother's
> patch? So both can go it.
+ other email address of the Xavier.
>
> Thanks,
> ferruh
>
>
> [1]
> https://patchwork.dpdk.org/user/todo/dpdk/?series=8679
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 26.11.2019 16:27, Ferruh Yigit пишет:
>>>> Hi Vadim,
>>>>
>>>> On 11/26/2019 11:55 AM, Vadim wrote:
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vadim <podovinnikov at protei.ru>
>>>> Can you please provide full "Name Surname <email at adress>" signature?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is bonding patch, please cc bonding maintainers (Chas, instead of John W.
>>>> Linville).
>>>>
>>>>> fix lacp check system address
>>>> Can you please give more details, what is failing what is the impact etc.
>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>>>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
>>>>> index b77a37ddb..d4dda790a 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
>>>>> @@ -792,18 +792,33 @@ rx_machine_update(struct bond_dev_private *internals, uint16_t slave_id,
>>>>> struct rte_mbuf *lacp_pkt) {
>>>>> struct lacpdu_header *lacp;
>>>>> struct lacpdu_actor_partner_params *partner;
>>>>> + struct port *port, *agg;
>>>>>
>>>>> if (lacp_pkt != NULL) {
>>>>> lacp = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(lacp_pkt, struct lacpdu_header *);
>>>>> RTE_ASSERT(lacp->lacpdu.subtype == SLOW_SUBTYPE_LACP);
>>>>>
>>>>> partner = &lacp->lacpdu.partner;
>>>>> + port = &bond_mode_8023ad_ports[slave_id];
>>>>> + agg = &bond_mode_8023ad_ports[port->aggregator_port_id];
>>>>> +
>>>>> if (rte_is_same_ether_addr(&partner->port_params.system,
>>>>> - &internals->mode4.mac_addr)) {
>>>>> + &agg->actor.system)) {
>>>>> /* This LACP frame is sending to the bonding port
>>>>> * so pass it to rx_machine.
>>>>> */
>>>>> rx_machine(internals, slave_id, &lacp->lacpdu);
>>>>> + } else {
>>>>> + char preferred_system_name[RTE_ETHER_ADDR_FMT_SIZE];
>>>>> + char self_system_name[RTE_ETHER_ADDR_FMT_SIZE];
>>>>> + rte_ether_format_addr(preferred_system_name,
>>>>> + RTE_ETHER_ADDR_FMT_SIZE,
>>>>> + &partner->port_params.system);
>>>>> + rte_ether_format_addr(self_system_name,
>>>>> + RTE_ETHER_ADDR_FMT_SIZE, &agg->actor.system);
>>>>> + MODE4_DEBUG("preferred partner system %s not equal "
>>>>> + "self system: %s\n",
>>>>> + preferred_system_name, self_system_name);
>>>>> }
>>>>> rte_pktmbuf_free(lacp_pkt);
>>>>> } else
>>>>>
>>
>
More information about the dev
mailing list