[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/33] DPDK Trace support

Jerin Jacob jerinjacobk at gmail.com
Fri Apr 10 15:29:37 CEST 2020


On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 6:45 PM David Marchand
<david.marchand at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 8:27 PM Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > The global level is just disabling some logs even if it is enabled
> > > in the logtype level.
> > > It only makes usage complicate.
> > > We should consider only logtype levels.
> >
> > OK.  Do we care about the following use case?
> > # Trace only specific types of events(example, DEBUG or CRITICAL)?
>
> The event types can be encoded in the tracepoint names if we want to
> organise trace points with types (maybe as a suffix).
>
> >
> > IF NOT,
> >
> > There is no need for,
> > # rte_trace_global_* API
> > # No need to introduce trace type(ie DEBUG or CRITICAL) i.e remove
> > rte_trace_level_set() API etc
> >
> >
> > # In summary:
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > # In the existing code:
> > The trace will be emitted when
> >  a) When the trace is enabled
> >  AND
> > b) trace level than the global level.
> >
> > # in new suggestion
> > The trace will be emitted when
> >  a) When it is enabled
> >
> > And the EAL argument will be --trace=regex/globbing, This EAL argument
> > will call rte_trace_regexp() and enable the selected tracepoints.
> >
> > The downside will be it will not be similar to log API. I am fine with
> > either way.
>
> The level notion in the traces api is artificial.
> I prefer a simple api where tracepoints state is controlled via a
> single criteria: with the new suggestion that would be names.
> So +1.

I thought it may be helpful to replace log and I decided to pick the
level in the trace.

Looks like the consensus is to remove "level" from Trace.
OK. I will rework the Trace API to remove the "level" and
rte_trace_global_* API from Trace library.
Let me know If you have any other top-level architecture comments if any.
I will send v5 with new changes.

>
>
> Afaiu, for logs, if we wanted to make use of the trace api, the level
> notion can be done in the rte_log layer.

That works too.

>
>
> --
> David Marchand
>


More information about the dev mailing list