[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ci: remove aarch64 from Travis jobs

Ruifeng Wang Ruifeng.Wang at arm.com
Fri Apr 17 10:49:01 CEST 2020


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2020 10:40 PM
> To: Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com>
> Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>; dev <dev at dpdk.org>;
> Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang at arm.com>; Gavin Hu <Gavin.Hu at arm.com>;
> Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli at arm.com>; Michael Santana
> <maicolgabriel at hotmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ci: remove aarch64 from Travis jobs
> 
> 16/04/2020 15:45, Aaron Conole:
> > David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com> writes:
> > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 2:44 PM Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > >> Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net> writes:
> > >>
> > >> > Travis is not reliable for native Arm and PPC:
> > >> > https://travis-ci.community/t/disk-quota-exceeded-on-arm64/7619/6
> > >> >
> > >> > In order to get reliable Travis reports, the use of Arm machines
> > >> > is removed until Travis fixes it.
> > >> >
> > >> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> > >> > ---
> > >>
> > >> We should add back the cross-build if we do this - at least then we
> > >> could have a reliable compilation test of Arm64 code.   Does it make
> > >> sense?
> > >
> > > I don't see them removed by this patch, the two jobs are still present ?
> >
> > Whoops - for some reason I missed them.  Nevermind :)
> 
> So? Acked?
> 
Can we achieve this by allowing failures on AArch64 jobs?
https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/build-matrix/#rows-that-are-allowed-to-fail

Add following setting:
jobs:
  allow_failures:
  - arch: arm64

So we can keep the jobs while not suffering from unstable infrastructure.
Results of these jobs will still observable. This gives us a chance to know when jobs are stable.

Thanks.
/Ruifeng
> 
> 



More information about the dev mailing list