[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of common bit operation APIs

[Joyce Kong]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2020 4:09 PM
> To: Joyce Kong <Joyce.Kong at arm.com>
> Cc: stephen at networkplumber.org; david.marchand at redhat.com;
> mb at smartsharesystems.com; jerinj at marvell.com;
> bruce.richardson at intel.com; ravi1.kumar at amd.com; rmody at marvell.com;
> shshaikh at marvell.com; xuanziyang2 at huawei.com;
> cloud.wangxiaoyun at huawei.com; zhouguoyang at huawei.com; Honnappa
> Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli at arm.com>; Gavin Hu
> <Gavin.Hu at arm.com>; Phil Yang <Phil.Yang at arm.com>; nd <nd at arm.com>;
> dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/6] lib/eal: implement the family of common bit
> operation APIs
> 
> 24/04/2020 05:21, Joyce Kong:
> > --- a/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md
> > +++ b/doc/api/doxy-api-index.md
> >  - **containers**:
> > +  [bitmap]             (@ref rte_bitmap.h),
> >    [mbuf]               (@ref rte_mbuf.h),
> >    [mbuf pool ops]      (@ref rte_mbuf_pool_ops.h),
> >    [ring]               (@ref rte_ring.h),
> >    [stack]              (@ref rte_stack.h),
> > -  [tailq]              (@ref rte_tailq.h),
> > -  [bitmap]             (@ref rte_bitmap.h)
> > +  [tailq]              (@ref rte_tailq.h)
> 
> Why do you move bitmap?
> I like having mbuf as the one.
> 
Yeah, will move bitmap back in v10.