[dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH] eal/trace: fix coverity issues

David Marchand david.marchand at redhat.com
Mon Apr 27 15:52:09 CEST 2020


On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 3:46 PM Sunil Kumar Kori <skori at marvell.com> wrote:
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
> >Sent: Monday, April 27, 2020 5:56 PM
> >To: Sunil Kumar Kori <skori at marvell.com>
> >Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj at marvell.com>; dev <dev at dpdk.org>
> >Subject: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/trace: fix coverity issues
> >
> >External Email
> >
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 2:04 PM Sunil Kumar Kori <skori at marvell.com>
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> Pointer was being dereferenced without NULL checking.
> >>
> >> Coverity issue: 357768
> >>
> >> Fixes: 8c8066ea6a7b ("trace: add trace mode configuration parameter")
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sunil Kumar Kori <skori at marvell.com>
> >> ---
> >>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_trace_utils.c | 3 ++-
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_trace_utils.c
> >> b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_trace_utils.c
> >> index fce8892c3..119e97119 100644
> >> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_trace_utils.c
> >> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_trace_utils.c
> >> @@ -227,15 +227,16 @@ int
> >>  eal_trace_mode_args_save(const char *optarg)  {
> >>         struct trace *trace = trace_obj_get();
> >> -       size_t len = strlen(optarg);
> >>         unsigned long tmp;
> >>         char *pattern;
> >> +       size_t len;
> >>
> >>         if (optarg == NULL) {
> >>                 trace_err("no optarg is passed");
> >>                 return -EINVAL;
> >>         }
> >>
> >> +       len = strlen(optarg);
> >>         if (len == 0) {
> >>                 trace_err("value is not provided with option");
> >>                 return -EINVAL;
> >
> >I was looking at some gcc 10 complaints on string manipulation later
> >in eal_trace_dir_args_save().
> >
> >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> >3A__build.opensuse.org_package_live-5Fbuild-5Flog_home-3Admarchan-
> >3Abranches-3Ahome-3Abluca-3Adpdk_dpdk_Fedora-5FRawhide_x86-
> >5F64&d=DwIFaQ&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=dXeXaAMkP5COgn1zxHMy
> >aF1_d9IIuq6vHQO6NrIPjaE&m=NZ72Sr2OMEYZD7PIY59lshlAxZJJJepF5oxbHv0j
> >5Zg&s=yOCA3PfhZojqJv0iVKlzeqM7tYGVv0jjrnVcajUx_qA&e=
> >
> >[  126s]   CC rte_malloc.o
> >[  127s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/dpdk-
> >1587835122.b13ace300/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_trace_utils.c:
> >In function 'eal_trace_dir_args_save':
> >[  127s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/dpdk-
> >1587835122.b13ace300/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_trace_utils.c:29
> >0:24:
> >error: 'sprintf' may write a terminating nul past the end of the
> >destination [-Werror=format-overflow=]
> >[  127s]   290 |  sprintf(dir_path, "%s/", optarg);
> >[  127s]       |                        ^
> >[  127s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/dpdk-
> >1587835122.b13ace300/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_trace_utils.c:29
> >0:2:
> >note: 'sprintf' output between 2 and 4097 bytes into a destination of
> >size 4096
> >[  127s]   290 |  sprintf(dir_path, "%s/", optarg);
> >[  127s]       |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >[  127s] cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> >
> >
> >Could we use asprintf in all this code and avoid malloc + sprintf ?
> >
> As I understood from above warnings/errors, real problem is writing beyond destination i.e. dir_path.
> If this is the case then it can be simply handled using snprintf(); with correct "size" information.
> Suggested code changes are correct. I am just trying to achieve this with lesser code changes.
>
> Also I think, fix for this should be a separate patch.
> Suggestions please ?

If the code was not combining this malloc + sprintf + wrong checks
(caught by coverity), we would avoid both issues and it would be more
consistent.
No more suggestion from me.


-- 
David Marchand



More information about the dev mailing list