[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] config: remap flags used for Arm platforms
Ferruh Yigit
ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Tue Aug 18 16:36:00 CEST 2020
On 8/14/2020 7:03 AM, Ruifeng Wang wrote:
> Flags are used to distinguish different platform architectures.
> These flags can be used to pick different code paths for different
> architectures at compile time.
> For Arm platforms, there are 3 flags in use: RTE_ARCH_ARM,
> RTE_ARCH_ARMv7 and RTE_ARCH_ARM64.
> RTE_ARCH_ARM64 is used to flag 64-bit aarch64 platforms,
> while RTE_ARCH_ARM & RTE_ARCH_ARMv7 are used to flag 32-bit platforms.
> RTE_ARCH_ARMv7 is for ARMv7 platforms as its name suggested.
>
> The issue is that flag name RTE_ARCH_ARM is unclear and could cause
> confusion. No info about platform word length is included in the name.
> To make the flag names more clear, a naming scheme is proposed.
>
> RTE_ARCH_ARM
> |
> +----RTE_ARCH_ARM32
> | |
> | +----RTE_ARCH_ARMv7
> | |
> | +----RTE_ARCH_ARMv8_AARCH32
> |
> +----RTE_ARCH_ARM64
>
> RTE_ARCH_ARM32 will be used for 32-bit Arm platforms.
> It includes RTE_ARCH_ARMv7 and RTE_ARCH_ARMv8_AARCH32.
> RTE_ARCH_ARMv7 is for ARMv7 platforms.
> RTE_ARCH_ARMv8_AARCH32 is for aarch32 state on aarch64 platforms.
> RTE_ARCH_ARM64 is for 64-bit Arm platforms.
> RTE_ARCH_ARM will be used for all Arm platforms, including RTE_ARCH_ARM32
> and RTE_ARCH_ARM64.
>
> To fit into the new naming scheme, current usage of RTE_ARCH_ARM in
> project code is mapped to RTE_ARCH_ARM32.
>
> Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang at arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang at arm.com>
> ---
<...>
> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> CONFIG_RTE_MACHINE="armv7a"
>
> CONFIG_RTE_ARCH="arm"
> -CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM=y
> +CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM32=y
> CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARMv7=y
> CONFIG_RTE_ARCH_ARM_TUNE="cortex-a9"
According commit log message I thought 'RTE_ARCH_ARM' will be always set, isn't
it the case?
Is below wrong:
aarch64 -> ARM | ARM64 | ARCH_64
armv7a -> ARM | ARM32 | ARMv7
aarch32 -> ARM | ARM32 | ARMv8_AARCH32
If so some of the 'defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM32) || defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)' checks
can be simplified as 'defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM)'
Also currently missing 'ARCH_64' flag implies the 32bit support, for all
architectures, what about having a common 'ARCH_32' flag and use for all arch,
instead of 'ARM32'? So something like below:
aarch64 -> ARM | ARM64 | ARCH_64
armv7a -> ARM | ARMv7 | ARCH_32
aarch32 -> ARM | ARMv8_AARCH32 | ARCH_32
Just to record matching flags for other archs are:
x86_64 -> X86 | X86_64 | ARCH_64
i686 -> X86 | I686
x86_32 -> X86 | X86_32
ppc_64 -> PPC_64 | ARCH_64
More information about the dev
mailing list