[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] testpmd: fix init mpls struct

Ori Kam orika at mellanox.com
Sun Feb 2 09:05:59 CET 2020


Hi Ferruh,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2020 1:01 PM
> To: Ori Kam <orika at mellanox.com>; Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>;
> Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu at intel.com>; Bernard Iremonger
> <bernard.iremonger at intel.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo at mellanox.com>;
> stable at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] testpmd: fix init mpls struct
> 
> On 1/30/2020 4:18 PM, Ori Kam wrote:
> > When adding mpls item we copy the structure, in some cases
> > the item is not initialized.
> >
> > This commit solves this by initializing the struct.
> >
> > Coverity issue: 325734
> > Fixes: a1191d39cb57 ("app/testpmd: add MPLSoUDP encapsulation")
> > Cc: stable at dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ori Kam <orika at mellanox.com>
> > ---
> >  app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > index e99e24c..42d90f5 100644
> > --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline_flow.c
> > @@ -4576,7 +4576,9 @@ static int comp_set_raw_index(struct context *,
> const struct token *,
> >  	struct rte_flow_item_gre gre = {
> >  		.protocol = rte_cpu_to_be_16(ETHER_TYPE_MPLS_UNICAST),
> >  	};
> > -	struct rte_flow_item_mpls mpls;
> > +	struct rte_flow_item_mpls mpls = {
> > +		.ttl = 0
> 
> I wasn't aware that this is valid 'c' syntax, no ',' at the end.
> 
> Anyway, I guess this patch has been superseded by following, right?
> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpatches.d
> pdk.org%2Fpatch%2F65383%2F&data=02%7C01%7Corika%40mellanox.co
> m%7C413906e79d3942d283f108d7a63ce6d7%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149
> 256f461b%7C0%7C0%7C637160652819605813&sdata=MxJo%2BJ2t4TlvT%
> 2BM0SzkPzAX9m8IJUtGIfUiVa3AzXaY%3D&reserved=0
> "app/testpmd: fix uninitialized members of mpls"
> 

Yes you are correct.
Sorry for incorrect versions,
I will send the relevant patch with version 2.

> > +	};
> >  	uint8_t *header;
> >  	int ret;
> >
> >



More information about the dev mailing list