[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] test/hash: add lock free reader writer functional tests
David Marchand
david.marchand at redhat.com
Wed Feb 5 10:07:53 CET 2020
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 8:49 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli
<honnappa.nagarahalli at arm.com> wrote:
>
> Add lock-free reader writer concurrency functional tests.
> These tests will provide the same coverage that non lock-free
> APIs have.
>
> Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli at arm.com>
> ---
> app/test/test_hash_readwrite.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite.c b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite.c
> index 635ed5a9f..a9429091c 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_hash_readwrite.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_hash_readwrite.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ test_hash_readwrite_worker(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
> }
>
> static int
> -init_params(int use_ext, int use_htm, int use_jhash)
> +init_params(int use_ext, int use_htm, int rw_lf, int use_jhash)
> {
> unsigned int i;
>
> @@ -140,15 +140,16 @@ init_params(int use_ext, int use_htm, int use_jhash)
> else
> hash_params.hash_func = rte_hash_crc;
>
> + hash_params.extra_flag = RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_MULTI_WRITER_ADD;
> if (use_htm)
> - hash_params.extra_flag =
> - RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_TRANS_MEM_SUPPORT |
> - RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY |
> - RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_MULTI_WRITER_ADD;
> + hash_params.extra_flag |=
> + RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_TRANS_MEM_SUPPORT;
> + if (rw_lf)
> + hash_params.extra_flag |=
> + RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY_LF;
> else
> - hash_params.extra_flag =
> - RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY |
> - RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_MULTI_WRITER_ADD;
> + hash_params.extra_flag |=
> + RTE_HASH_EXTRA_FLAGS_RW_CONCURRENCY;
>
> if (use_ext)
> hash_params.extra_flag |=
> @@ -195,7 +196,7 @@ init_params(int use_ext, int use_htm, int use_jhash)
> }
>
> static int
> -test_hash_readwrite_functional(int use_ext, int use_htm)
> +test_hash_readwrite_functional(int use_htm, int use_rw_lf, int use_ext)
This is a bit hard to read, please keep the same order than init_params.
> {
> unsigned int i;
> const void *next_key;
> @@ -214,7 +215,7 @@ test_hash_readwrite_functional(int use_ext, int use_htm)
> rte_atomic64_init(&ginsertions);
> rte_atomic64_clear(&ginsertions);
>
> - if (init_params(use_ext, use_htm, use_jhash) != 0)
> + if (init_params(use_ext, use_htm, use_rw_lf, use_jhash) != 0)
> goto err;
>
> if (use_ext)
> @@ -229,6 +230,8 @@ test_hash_readwrite_functional(int use_ext, int use_htm)
> tbl_rw_test_param.num_insert
> * slave_cnt;
>
> + printf("\nHTM = %d, RW-LF = %d, EXT-Table = %d\n",
> + use_htm, use_rw_lf, use_ext);
> printf("++++++++Start function tests:+++++++++\n");
>
> /* Fire all threads. */
> @@ -379,7 +382,7 @@ test_hash_readwrite_perf(struct perf *perf_results, int use_htm,
> rte_atomic64_init(&gwrite_cycles);
> rte_atomic64_clear(&gwrite_cycles);
>
> - if (init_params(0, use_htm, use_jhash) != 0)
> + if (init_params(0, use_htm, 0, use_jhash) != 0)
> goto err;
>
> /*
> @@ -700,7 +703,6 @@ test_hash_rw_func_main(void)
> * than writer threads. This is to timing either reader threads or
> * writer threads for performance numbers.
> */
> - int use_htm, use_ext;
The comments block just before is out of sync.
> unsigned int i = 0, core_id = 0;
>
> if (rte_lcore_count() < 3) {
> @@ -721,29 +723,41 @@ test_hash_rw_func_main(void)
>
> printf("Test read-write with Hardware transactional memory\n");
>
> - use_htm = 1;
> - use_ext = 0;
> + /* htm = 1, rw_lf = 0, ext = 0 */
I didn't like those local variables.
But comments tend to get out of sync fairly easily, please remove too.
> + if (test_hash_readwrite_functional(1, 0, 0) < 0)
> + return -1;
>
> - if (test_hash_readwrite_functional(use_ext, use_htm) < 0)
> + /* htm = 1, rw_lf = 1, ext = 0 */
> + if (test_hash_readwrite_functional(1, 1, 0) < 0)
> return -1;
>
> - use_ext = 1;
> - if (test_hash_readwrite_functional(use_ext, use_htm) < 0)
> + /* htm = 1, rw_lf = 0, ext = 1 */
> + if (test_hash_readwrite_functional(1, 0, 1) < 0)
> return -1;
>
> + /* htm = 1, rw_lf = 1, ext = 1 */
> + if (test_hash_readwrite_functional(1, 1, 1) < 0)
> + return -1;
> } else {
> printf("Hardware transactional memory (lock elision) "
> "is NOT supported\n");
> }
>
> printf("Test read-write without Hardware transactional memory\n");
> - use_htm = 0;
> - use_ext = 0;
> - if (test_hash_readwrite_functional(use_ext, use_htm) < 0)
> + /* htm = 0, rw_lf = 0, ext = 0 */
> + if (test_hash_readwrite_functional(0, 0, 0) < 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + /* htm = 0, rw_lf = 1, ext = 0 */
> + if (test_hash_readwrite_functional(0, 1, 0) < 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + /* htm = 0, rw_lf = 0, ext = 1 */
> + if (test_hash_readwrite_functional(0, 0, 1) < 0)
> return -1;
>
> - use_ext = 1;
> - if (test_hash_readwrite_functional(use_ext, use_htm) < 0)
> + /* htm = 0, rw_lf = 1, ext = 1 */
> + if (test_hash_readwrite_functional(0, 1, 1) < 0)
> return -1;
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
David Marchand
More information about the dev
mailing list