[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/af_packet: remove limitation on number of qpairs

Ferruh Yigit ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Fri Feb 28 11:08:43 CET 2020


On 2/27/2020 8:00 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Since qpairs is part of the vdev arguments, there is no need to
> limit it to 16. The queue arrays can be dynamically sized based
> on the requested parameters.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>
> ---
>  drivers/net/af_packet/rte_eth_af_packet.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/af_packet/rte_eth_af_packet.c b/drivers/net/af_packet/rte_eth_af_packet.c
> index f5806bf42c46..e5e0aa9277a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/af_packet/rte_eth_af_packet.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/af_packet/rte_eth_af_packet.c
> @@ -37,8 +37,6 @@
>  #define DFLT_FRAME_SIZE		(1 << 11)
>  #define DFLT_FRAME_COUNT	(1 << 9)
>  
> -#define RTE_PMD_AF_PACKET_MAX_RINGS 16
> -
>  struct pkt_rx_queue {
>  	int sockfd;
>  
> @@ -77,8 +75,8 @@ struct pmd_internals {
>  
>  	struct tpacket_req req;
>  
> -	struct pkt_rx_queue rx_queue[RTE_PMD_AF_PACKET_MAX_RINGS];
> -	struct pkt_tx_queue tx_queue[RTE_PMD_AF_PACKET_MAX_RINGS];
> +	struct pkt_rx_queue *rx_queue;
> +	struct pkt_tx_queue *tx_queue;
>  };
>  
>  static const char *valid_arguments[] = {
> @@ -601,6 +599,18 @@ rte_pmd_init_internals(struct rte_vdev_device *dev,
>  	if (*internals == NULL)
>  		return -1;
>  
> +
> +	(*internals)->rx_queue = rte_calloc_socket("af_packet_rx",
> +						nb_queues,
> +						sizeof(struct pkt_rx_queue),
> +						0, numa_node);
> +	(*internals)->tx_queue = rte_calloc_socket("af_packet_tx",
> +						nb_queues,
> +						sizeof(struct pkt_tx_queue),
> +						0, numa_node);

Not for this patch but right now all queue initialization done during init based
on max queue PMD can support, we may move allocating and configuring queues in
'eth_rx_queue_setup' & 'eth_tx_queue_setup' based on number of queue application
request, in the future...

> +	if (!(*internals)->rx_queue || !(*internals)->tx_queue)
> +		return -1;

If only one allocation fails, should we free the other?

> +
>  	for (q = 0; q < nb_queues; q++) {
>  		(*internals)->rx_queue[q].map = MAP_FAILED;
>  		(*internals)->tx_queue[q].map = MAP_FAILED;
> @@ -846,8 +856,7 @@ rte_eth_from_packet(struct rte_vdev_device *dev,
>  		pair = &kvlist->pairs[k_idx];
>  		if (strstr(pair->key, ETH_AF_PACKET_NUM_Q_ARG) != NULL) {
>  			qpairs = atoi(pair->value);
> -			if (qpairs < 1 ||
> -			    qpairs > RTE_PMD_AF_PACKET_MAX_RINGS) {
> +			if (qpairs < 1) {
>  				PMD_LOG(ERR,
>  					"%s: invalid qpairs value",
>  				        name);
> @@ -1019,6 +1028,8 @@ rte_pmd_af_packet_remove(struct rte_vdev_device *dev)
>  		rte_free(internals->tx_queue[q].rd);
>  	}
>  	free(internals->if_name);
> +	rte_free(internals->rx_queue);
> +	rte_free(internals->tx_queue);
>  
>  	rte_eth_dev_release_port(eth_dev);
>  
> 



More information about the dev mailing list