[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 10/11] examples/l3fwd: add graceful teardown for eventdevice
Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
pbhagavatula at marvell.com
Mon Jan 6 05:50:16 CET 2020
>> Add graceful teardown that addresses both event mode and poll
>mode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula at marvell.com>
>> ---
>> examples/l3fwd/main.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>------------
>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/main.c b/examples/l3fwd/main.c
>> index 0ae64dd41..68998f42c 100644
>> --- a/examples/l3fwd/main.c
>> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/main.c
>> @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
>> struct lcore_conf *qconf;
>> struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info;
>> struct rte_eth_txconf *txconf;
>> - int ret;
>> + int i, ret;
>> unsigned nb_ports;
>> uint16_t queueid, portid;
>> unsigned lcore_id;
>> @@ -1195,27 +1195,46 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -
>> check_all_ports_link_status(enabled_port_mask);
>>
>> ret = 0;
>> /* launch per-lcore init on every lcore */
>> rte_eal_mp_remote_launch(l3fwd_lkp.main_loop, NULL,
>CALL_MASTER);
>> - RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_SLAVE(lcore_id) {
>> - if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(lcore_id) < 0) {
>> - ret = -1;
>> - break;
>> + if (evt_rsrc->enabled) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < evt_rsrc->rx_adptr.nb_rx_adptr; i++)
>> + rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_stop(
>> + evt_rsrc->rx_adptr.rx_adptr[i]);
>> + for (i = 0; i < evt_rsrc->tx_adptr.nb_tx_adptr; i++)
>> + rte_event_eth_tx_adapter_stop(
>> + evt_rsrc->tx_adptr.tx_adptr[i]);
>> +
>> + RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(portid) {
>> + if ((enabled_port_mask & (1 << portid)) == 0)
>> + continue;
>> + rte_eth_dev_stop(portid);
>> }
>> - }
>>
>> - /* stop ports */
>> - RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(portid) {
>> - if ((enabled_port_mask & (1 << portid)) == 0)
>> - continue;
>> - printf("Closing port %d...", portid);
>> - rte_eth_dev_stop(portid);
>> - rte_eth_dev_close(portid);
>> - printf(" Done\n");
>
>Why to stop ports *before* making sure all lcores are stopped?
>Shouldn't that peace of code be identical for both poll and event mode?
>Something like:
>rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
>
> RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(portid) {
> if ((enabled_port_mask & (1 << portid)) == 0)
> continue;
> rte_eth_dev_stop(portid);
> rte_eth_dev_close(portid);
> }
>?
>
Event dev spec requires stopping producers before consumers else we might run into
deadlock in some cases.
>> + rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
>> + RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(portid) {
>> + if ((enabled_port_mask & (1 << portid)) == 0)
>> + continue;
>> + rte_eth_dev_close(portid);
>> + }
>> +
>> + rte_event_dev_stop(evt_rsrc->event_d_id);
>> + rte_event_dev_close(evt_rsrc->event_d_id);
>> +
>> + } else {
>> + rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
>> +
>> + RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(portid) {
>> + if ((enabled_port_mask & (1 << portid)) == 0)
>> + continue;
>> + printf("Closing port %d...", portid);
>> + rte_eth_dev_stop(portid);
>> + rte_eth_dev_close(portid);
>> + printf(" Done\n");
>> + }
>> }
>> printf("Bye...\n");
>>
>> --
>> 2.17.1
More information about the dev
mailing list