[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] drivers: move ifc driver to the vDPA class
Thomas Monjalon
thomas at monjalon.net
Fri Jan 10 13:59:36 CET 2020
10/01/2020 13:34, Maxime Coquelin:
> On 1/10/20 1:31 PM, Wang, Haiyue wrote:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> >> 10/01/2020 10:07, Matan Azrad:
> >>> From: Wang, Haiyue
> >>>> From: Matan Azrad
> >>>>>> delete mode 100644 doc/guides/nics/ifc.rst create mode 100644
> >>>>>> doc/guides/vdpadevs/features/ifcvf.ini
> >>>>>> create mode 100644 doc/guides/vdpadevs/ifc.rst delete mode 100644
> >>>>>> drivers/net/ifc/Makefile delete mode 100644
> >>>>>> drivers/net/ifc/base/ifcvf.c delete mode 100644
> >>>>>> drivers/net/ifc/base/ifcvf.h delete mode 100644
> >>>>>> drivers/net/ifc/base/ifcvf_osdep.h
> >>>>>> delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ifc/ifcvf_vdpa.c delete mode 100644
> >>>>>> drivers/net/ifc/meson.build delete mode 100644
> >>>>>> drivers/net/ifc/rte_pmd_ifc_version.map
> >>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/vdpa/ifc/Makefile create mode 100644
> >>>>>> drivers/vdpa/ifc/base/ifcvf.c create mode 100644
> >>>>>> drivers/vdpa/ifc/base/ifcvf.h create mode 100644
> >>>>>> drivers/vdpa/ifc/base/ifcvf_osdep.h
> >>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/vdpa/ifc/ifcvf_vdpa.c create mode
> >>>>>> 100644 drivers/vdpa/ifc/meson.build create mode 100644
> >>>>>> drivers/vdpa/ifc/rte_pmd_ifc_version.map
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> git mv drivers/net/ifc/ drivers/vdpa/ifc ? ;-)
> >>>
> >>> Yes, and more file move in docs. (you can see like rename in git 😊)
> >>> Adjusted also the classes makefiles\measons to remove from net and to add in vdpa.
> >>> Also MAINTAINER file etc...
> >>
> >> I think the comment from Haiyue was about the files deleted and created
> >> in the patch, instead of being moved (renamed).
> >
> > Yes, I moved one Intel PMD code, then the patch is very small, it is like:
> >
> > rename drivers/{net/iavf/base => common/iavf}/iavf_common.c (100%)
> > rename drivers/{net/iavf/base => common/iavf}/iavf_devids.h (100%)
> >
> > detail is : https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/64384/
>
> Nice, and the advantage of doing so is that git would be smarter when
> doing backport to stable branch.
No, git won't be smarter.
As explained below, the format of the diff does not change the internal
git representation of the change.
Move/Rename is just a nice formatting done by smart detection.
> >> As far as I know, this is for 2 reasons:
> >> - there is no move in internal git representation
> >> - some versions of git-diff does not detect moves properly,
> >> but option -M may help
More information about the dev
mailing list