[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: set git tree for packet framework and QoS

[Dumitrescu, Cristian]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 10:27 AM
> To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> Cc: dev <dev at dpdk.org>; Dumitrescu, Cristian
> <cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com>; Singh, Jasvinder
> <jasvinder.singh at intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] maintainers: set git tree for packet framework and QoS
> 
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:23 AM Thomas Monjalon
> <thomas at monjalon.net> wrote:
> >
> > 14/01/2020 11:05, David Marchand:
> > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > > @@ -1256,6 +1256,7 @@ F:
> doc/guides/sample_app_ug/packet_ordering.rst
> > >  Hierarchical scheduler
> > >  M: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com>
> > >  M: Jasvinder Singh <jasvinder.singh at intel.com>
> > > +T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-qos
> > >  F: lib/librte_sched/
> > >  F: doc/guides/prog_guide/qos_framework.rst
> > >  F: app/test/test_red.c
> >
> > librte_meter is also candidate to QoS tree.
> 
> Argh, thought I had double checked... ok will fix.
> 

Yes, librte_meter should also go to the QoS tree.

> 
> > About ethdev TM and MTR, I am not sure what is the right thing to do.
> 
> The drivers using those apis are in dpdk-next-net.
> 

Yes, these APIs are ethdev API, although QoS related.

> 
> --
> David Marchand