[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: set git tree for packet framework and QoS
David Marchand
david.marchand at redhat.com
Tue Jan 14 11:46:23 CET 2020
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:36 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> 14/01/2020 11:27, David Marchand:
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:23 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net> wrote:
> > > 14/01/2020 11:05, David Marchand:
> > > About ethdev TM and MTR, I am not sure what is the right thing to do.
> >
> > The drivers using those apis are in dpdk-next-net.
>
> Yes this is my question:
> Is it fine merging QoS related patches on ethdev, drivers and testpmd
> in dpdk-next-net, or do we want them to be managed separately in dpdk-next-qos?
> There is not much activity here, so I am just anticipating a heavier activity.
If we move those files under the qos subtree, it will be impossible
(?) to identify QoS only changes on those drivers, so we will end with
the patches going to master.
--
David Marchand
More information about the dev
mailing list