[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/6] crypto/aesni_gcm: cpu crypto support

[Ananyev, Konstantin]

> > > > Add support for CPU crypto mode by introducing required handler.
> > > > Crypto mode (sync/async) is chosen during sym session create if an
> > > > appropriate flag is set in an xform type number.
> > > >
> > > > Authenticated encryption and decryption are supported with tag
> > > > generation/verification.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Marcin Smoczynski <marcinx.smoczynski at intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/crypto/aesni_gcm/aesni_gcm_ops.h      |   9 ++
> > > >  drivers/crypto/aesni_gcm/aesni_gcm_pmd.c      | 149 +++++++++++++++++-
> > > >  drivers/crypto/aesni_gcm/aesni_gcm_pmd_ops.c  |   3 +
> > > >  .../crypto/aesni_gcm/aesni_gcm_pmd_private.h  |  18 ++-
> > > >  4 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/aesni_gcm/aesni_gcm_ops.h
> > > > b/drivers/crypto/aesni_gcm/aesni_gcm_ops.h
> > > > index e272f1067..404c0adff 100644
> > >
> > > ...
> > > >
> > > >  	/* AES-GMAC */
> > > > -	if (xform->type == RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AUTH) {
> > > > +	if (xform_type == RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AUTH) {
> > > >  		auth_xform = xform;
> > > >  		if (auth_xform->auth.algo != RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_AES_GMAC) {
> > >
> > > Could you add support for AES-GMAC, so all algorithms supported by this PMD
> > support this new API?
> >
> > Not sure I get you here...
> > This code is present in current version of the driver too, no addition/deletions as
> > I can see:
> >
> > /* AES-GMAC */
> >         if (xform->type == RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_AUTH) {
> >                 auth_xform = xform;
> >                 if (auth_xform->auth.algo != RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_AES_GMAC) {
> >                         AESNI_GCM_LOG(ERR, "Only AES GMAC is supported as an "
> >                                 "authentication only algorithm");
> >                         return -ENOTSUP;
> >                 }
> >
> >
> > The only thing is changed: xform type calculation.
> 
> From what I can see, sess->op is not set for AES-GMAC.
> In aesni_gcm_pmd_cpu_crypto_process(), this value is checked,
> In the switch that is in line 471.

Ah, you mean sess->ops.* are not initialized properly for GMAC, right?

> 
> Looks like in this case, this would return an invalid status.
> 
> Am I getting this wrong?
> 
> Thanks!
> Pablo
> 
> > Konstantin