[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 02/15] common/octeontx2: add routine to check if sec capable otx2

[Anoob Joseph]

Hi Akhil,

Please see inline.

Thanks,
Anoob

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal at nxp.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 12:31 PM
> To: Anoob Joseph <anoobj at marvell.com>; Declan Doherty
> <declan.doherty at intel.com>; Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> Cc: Vamsi Krishna Attunuru <vattunuru at marvell.com>; Jerin Jacob
> Kollanukkaran <jerinj at marvell.com>; Narayana Prasad Raju Athreya
> <pathreya at marvell.com>; Kiran Kumar Kokkilagadda
> <kirankumark at marvell.com>; Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram
> <ndabilpuram at marvell.com>; Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
> <pbhagavatula at marvell.com>; Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi at marvell.com>;
> Archana Muniganti <marchana at marvell.com>; Tejasree Kondoj
> <ktejasree at marvell.com>; Lukas Bartosik <lbartosik at marvell.com>;
> dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [EXT] RE: [PATCH v2 02/15] common/octeontx2: add routine to check if
> sec capable otx2
> 
> External Email
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Hi Anoob,
> 
> >
> > From: Vamsi Attunuru <vattunuru at marvell.com>
> >
> > This routine returns true if given rte_eth_dev is security offload
> > capable and belongs to octeontx2.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anoob Joseph <anoobj at marvell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tejasree Kondoj <ktejasree at marvell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vamsi Attunuru <vattunuru at marvell.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_common.c               | 20
> > ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_common.h               |  2 ++
> >  .../octeontx2/rte_common_octeontx2_version.map       |  1 +
> >  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_common.c
> > b/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_common.c
> > index 7e45366..2f9b167 100644
> > --- a/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_common.c
> > +++ b/drivers/common/octeontx2/otx2_common.c
> > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> >   */
> >
> >  #include <rte_atomic.h>
> > +#include <rte_ethdev.h>
> >  #include <rte_malloc.h>
> >  #include <rte_log.h>
> >
> > @@ -23,6 +24,25 @@ otx2_npa_set_defaults(struct otx2_idev_cfg *idev)
> >
> >  /**
> >   * @internal
> > + * Check if rte_eth_dev is security offload capable otx2_eth_dev  */
> > +uint8_t otx2_ethdev_is_sec_capable(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev) {
> > +	struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev;
> > +
> > +	pci_dev = RTE_ETH_DEV_TO_PCI(eth_dev);
> > +
> > +	if (pci_dev->id.device_id == PCI_DEVID_OCTEONTX2_RVU_PF ||
> > +	    pci_dev->id.device_id == PCI_DEVID_OCTEONTX2_RVU_VF ||
> > +	    pci_dev->id.device_id == PCI_DEVID_OCTEONTX2_RVU_AF_VF)
> > +		return 1;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> 
> Why is this API defined in common?
> This is a capability of ethernet device and is only specific to OCTEONTX2 driver.

[Anoob] Crypto PMD is querying eth dev device for 'security' capability. If we put the call in ethdev PMD, then there will be a build dependency. 

This is required because we need to map crypto queues to eth devices. This is required for outbound processing.
 
> 
> - Akhil