[dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] net/qede: add infrastructure for debug data collection

Rasesh Mody rmody at marvell.com
Fri Jul 10 01:30:25 CEST 2020


>From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
>Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2020 9:37 AM
>
>On 7/8/2020 11:50 PM, Rasesh Mody wrote:
>> The patch adds QEDE PMD ops and APIs to calculate the size and collect
>> the debug dump for various firmware components. The patch adds new
>> files qede_debug.[ch] that has all the firmware debug data collection
>> infrastructure changes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rasesh Mody <rmody at marvell.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Igor Russkikh <irusskikh at marvell.com>
>
><...>
>
>> +		/* Add parsed element to parsed buffer */
>> +		results_offset +=
>> +		    sprintf(qed_get_buf_ptr(results_buf,
>> +					    results_offset),
>> +			    "raw: 0x%016lx, address: 0x%07x, access: %-5s, pf:
>%2d, vf: %s, port: %d, privilege: %-3s, protection: %-12s, master: %-4s, error:
>%s\n",
>> +			    elements[i].data,
>> +			    (u32)GET_FIELD(elements[i].data,
>> +					   REG_FIFO_ELEMENT_ADDRESS) *
>> +			    REG_FIFO_ELEMENT_ADDR_FACTOR,
>> +			    s_access_strs[GET_FIELD(elements[i].data,
>> +
>REG_FIFO_ELEMENT_ACCESS)],
>> +			    (u32)GET_FIELD(elements[i].data,
>> +					   REG_FIFO_ELEMENT_PF),
>> +			    vf_str,
>> +			    (u32)GET_FIELD(elements[i].data,
>> +					   REG_FIFO_ELEMENT_PORT),
>> +			    s_privilege_strs[GET_FIELD(elements[i].data,
>> +
>	REG_FIFO_ELEMENT_PRIVILEGE)],
>> +			    s_protection_strs[GET_FIELD(elements[i].data,
>> +
>	REG_FIFO_ELEMENT_PROTECTION)],
>> +			    s_master_strs[GET_FIELD(elements[i].data,
>> +
>REG_FIFO_ELEMENT_MASTER)],
>> +			    err_msg ? err_msg : "unknown error code");
>
>Another 32 bits build error from this line [1], fixed while merging as '0x%016lx'
>-> '0x%016"PRIx64"', please double check in next-net.
>
>Also split long line.
>

Thanks Ferruh, change looks good.

>
>[1]
>../drivers/net/qede/qede_debug.c: In function ‘qed_parse_reg_fifo_dump’:
>../drivers/net/qede/qede_debug.c:6742:21: error: format ‘%lx’ expects
>argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘u64 {aka long
>long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
>        "raw: 0x%016lx, address: 0x%07x, access: %-5s, pf: %2d, vf: %s, port:
>%d, privilege: %-3s, protection: %-12s, master: %-4s, error: %s\n",
>                ~~~~~^
>                %016llx
>        elements[i].data,
>        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



More information about the dev mailing list