[dpdk-dev] [20.08 PATCH] license: removing the dual prefix to avoid confusion
Stephen Hemminger
stephen at networkplumber.org
Tue Jul 28 19:21:34 CEST 2020
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:28:40 +0530
Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com> wrote:
> This patch removes the dual keyword from dual license
> definitions to avoid confusion. As the *dual* word is
> not required to be added SPDX license.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>
> ---
> license/exceptions.txt | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/license/exceptions.txt b/license/exceptions.txt
> index c984764a0..3afb996ed 100644
> --- a/license/exceptions.txt
> +++ b/license/exceptions.txt
> @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ IP License policy as defined in DPDK Charter available at:
>
> Note that following licenses are not exceptions:-
> - BSD-3-Clause
> - - Dual BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0
> - - Dual BSD-3-Clause OR LGPL-2.1
> + - BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0
> + - BSD-3-Clause OR LGPL-2.1
> - GPL-2.0 (*Only for kernel code*)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Makes sense to me, but probably needs Board legal approval
More information about the dev
mailing list