[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] mempool: use generic memory management

[Andrew Rybchenko]

On 6/2/20 12:14 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 01/06/2020 21:59, Dmitry Kozlyuk:
>> 1. What do you think about changing rte_ to rte_eal_ prefix for memory
>> management wrappers in MM series as Andrew Rybchenko suggested for v1? Since
>> the functions are DPDK-internal, this sounds reasonable to me.
> 
> For lib-internal function, the prefix should not start with rte_.
> For exported function (even if internal), the prefix should be rte_[component]_.
> For memory related functions, rte_mem_ is better than rte_eal_.

Yes, I agree.