[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/2] timer: support EAL functions on Windows
Ranjit Menon
ranjit.menon at intel.com
Thu Jun 18 00:15:51 CEST 2020
On 6/17/2020 2:39 AM, Fady Bader wrote:
> Implemented the needed Windows eal timer functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fady Bader <fady at mellanox.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_eal/common/meson.build | 1 +
> lib/librte_eal/windows/eal.c | 6 +++
> lib/librte_eal/windows/eal_timer.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/librte_eal/windows/include/rte_os.h | 2 +
> lib/librte_eal/windows/meson.build | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 101 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 lib/librte_eal/windows/eal_timer.c
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/meson.build b/lib/librte_eal/common/meson.build
> index 3108442697..4bdf77922f 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/meson.build
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/meson.build
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ if is_windows
> 'malloc_elem.c',
> 'malloc_heap.c',
> 'rte_malloc.c',
> + 'eal_common_timer.c',
> )
> subdir_done()
> endif
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/windows/eal.c b/lib/librte_eal/windows/eal.c
> index 427a5557fa..b6bffd3d92 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/windows/eal.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/windows/eal.c
> @@ -354,6 +354,12 @@ rte_eal_init(int argc, char **argv)
> return -1;
> }
>
> + if (rte_eal_timer_init() < 0) {
> + rte_eal_init_alert("Cannot init TSC timer");
> + rte_errno = EFAULT;
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> eal_thread_init_master(rte_config.master_lcore);
>
> RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_SLAVE(i) {
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/windows/eal_timer.c b/lib/librte_eal/windows/eal_timer.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..59099e8942
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/windows/eal_timer.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> + * Copyright 2020 Mellanox Technologies, Ltd
> + */
> +#include <inttypes.h>
> +
> +#include <rte_windows.h>
> +#include <rte_common.h>
> +#include <rte_cycles.h>
> +#include <rte_eal.h>
> +#include <rte_errno.h>
> +#include "eal_private.h"
> +
> +#define US_PER_SEC 1E6
> +#define CYC_PER_10MHZ 1E7
> +
> +void
> +rte_delay_us_sleep(unsigned int us)
> +{
> + HANDLE timer;
> + LARGE_INTEGER due_time;
> +
> + /* create waitable timer */
> + timer = CreateWaitableTimer(NULL, TRUE, NULL);
> + if (!timer) {
> + RTE_LOG_WIN32_ERR("CreateWaitableTimer()");
> + rte_errno = ENOMEM;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * due_time's uom is 100 ns, multiply by 10 to convert to microseconds
> + * set us microseconds time for timer
> + */
> + due_time.QuadPart = -((int64_t)us * 10);
> + if (!SetWaitableTimer(timer, &due_time, 0, NULL, NULL, FALSE)) {
> + RTE_LOG_WIN32_ERR("SetWaitableTimer()");
> + rte_errno = EINVAL;
> + goto end;
> + }
> + /* start wait for timer for us microseconds */
> + if (WaitForSingleObject(timer, INFINITE) == WAIT_FAILED) {
> + RTE_LOG_WIN32_ERR("WaitForSingleObject()");
> + rte_errno = EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> +end:
> + CloseHandle(timer);
> +}
> +
> +uint64_t
> +get_tsc_freq(void)
> +{
> + LARGE_INTEGER t_start, t_end, elapsed_us;
> + LARGE_INTEGER frequency;
> + uint64_t tsc_hz;
> + uint64_t end, start = rte_get_tsc_cycles();
I think a better implementation may be:
uint64_t start, end;
QueryPerformanceFrequency(&frequency);
start = rte_get_tsc_cycles();
QueryPerformanceCounter(&t_start);
rte_delay_us_sleep(US_PER_SEC / 10); /* 1/10 second */
.....
> +
> + QueryPerformanceCounter(&t_start);
> + QueryPerformanceFrequency(&frequency);
> +
> + rte_delay_us_sleep(US_PER_SEC / 10); /* 1/10 second */
> +
> + if (rte_errno != 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> + QueryPerformanceCounter(&t_end);
> + end = rte_get_tsc_cycles();
> +
> + elapsed_us.QuadPart = t_end.QuadPart - t_start.QuadPart;
> +
> + /*
> + * To guard against loss-of-precision, convert to microseconds
> + * *before* dividing by ticks-per-second.
> + */
> + elapsed_us.QuadPart *= US_PER_SEC;
> + elapsed_us.QuadPart /= frequency.QuadPart;
> +
> + double secs = ((double)elapsed_us.QuadPart)/US_PER_SEC;
> + tsc_hz = (uint64_t)((end - start)/secs);
> +
> + /* Round up to 10Mhz. 1E7 ~ 10Mhz */
> + return RTE_ALIGN_MUL_NEAR(tsc_hz, CYC_PER_10MHZ);
> +}
[Snip]
ranjit m.
More information about the dev
mailing list